Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — NORTHEASTERN NEVADA REGIONAL HOSPITA 2026-04-26 09:06 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — NORTHEASTERN NEVADA REGIONAL HOSPITA
CCN 290008 | NV | 59 beds | Current EBITDA $13.0M → Pro Forma $17.4M (+$4.4M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$84.2M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$13.0M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$4.4M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$17.4M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$3.2M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

62%
Realization (C)
$4.4M
Modeled Uplift
$2.8M
Risk-Adjusted
-$1.7M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 62% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Commercial Payer %, Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $2.8M (vs $4.4M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$1.7M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$1.7M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$1.0M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$54K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$4.4M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$1.7M$1.7M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$1.6M$46K$1.7M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$258K$766K$1.0M$3.2M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$54K$54K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT53.6% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$421K$842K$1.3M$1.7M$1.7M$1.7M$1.7M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$417K$833K$1.2M$1.7M$1.7M$1.7M$1.7M
A/R Days Reduction$0$341K$683K$1.0M$1.0M$1.0M$1.0M$1.0M
Clean Claim Rate$0$27K$54K$54K$54K$54K$54K$54K
Cumulative$0$1.2M$2.4M$3.6M$4.4M$4.4M$4.4M$4.4M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $4.4M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x50% / 7.7x55% / 8.9x59% / 10.2x61% / 10.8x63% / 11.4x
9.0x45% / 6.5x50% / 7.6x54% / 8.7x56% / 9.2x58% / 9.8x
10.0x41% / 5.5x45% / 6.5x50% / 7.5x51% / 8.0x53% / 8.4x
11.0x36% / 4.7x41% / 5.6x45% / 6.5x47% / 6.9x49% / 7.4x
12.0x32% / 4.1x37% / 4.9x42% / 5.7x44% / 6.1x45% / 6.5x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.3x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.2x
Headroom (turns)
3%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 3% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.3x, adding 2.1 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$13.0M$13.0M15.5%
Year 1$13.4M+$3.0M$16.4M19.4%
Year 2$13.8M+$4.4M$18.2M21.7%
Year 3$14.2M+$4.4M$18.7M22.2%
Year 4$14.7M+$4.4M$19.1M22.7%
Year 5$15.1M+$4.4M$19.5M23.2%
$130.2M
Entry EV (10x)
$214.8M
Exit EV (11x)
$84.5M
Value Created
$19.5M
Exit EBITDA
$20.7M
Organic Growth
$44.3M
RCM Value Creation
$19.5M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$842K$1.3M$1.7M$2.0M
Denial Rate Reductio$833K$1.2M$1.7M$2.0M
A/R Days Reduction$512K$768K$1.0M$1.2M
Clean Claim Rate$27K$40K$54K$65K
Total$2.2M$3.3M$4.4M$5.3M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 17 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin15.5%-1.8%5.1%12.2%
P88
Net-to-Gross33.8%27.3%39.2%53.6%
P29
Occupancy22.8%54.5%61.3%71.2%
P12
Rev/Bed$1.4M$213K$444K$812K
P82
Exp/Bed$1.2M$308K$454K$606K
P82

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML