Bridge Realization Estimate
ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)
Expected realization: 70% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risks: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $30.8M (vs $44.2M modeled).
EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers
Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).
Lever Detail
Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.
| Lever | Current | Target | Revenue | Cost | EBITDA | WC | Ramp |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost to Collect | 4.5% DEFAULT | 2.5% BENCHMARK | $0 | $16.8M | $16.8M | $0 | 12mo |
| Denial Rate Reduction | 12.0% DEFAULT | 6.5% BENCHMARK | $16.2M | $462K | $16.6M | $0 | 12mo |
| A/R Days Reduction | 52.00 DEFAULT | 38.00 BENCHMARK | $2.6M | $7.6M | $10.2M | $32.2M | 9mo |
| Clean Claim Rate | 88.0% DEFAULT | 96.0% BENCHMARK | $0 | $537K | $537K | $0 | 6mo |
| Net Collection Rate | 93.5% DEFAULT | 31.9% BENCHMARK | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | 18mo |
| CDI / Case Mix Index | 135.0% DEFAULT | 142.0% BENCHMARK | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | 18mo |
Implementation Timing Curve
Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.
| Lever | M0 | M3 | M6 | M9 | M12 | M18 | M24 | M36 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost to Collect | $0 | $4.2M | $8.4M | $12.6M | $16.8M | $16.8M | $16.8M | $16.8M |
| Denial Rate Reduction | $0 | $4.2M | $8.3M | $12.5M | $16.6M | $16.6M | $16.6M | $16.6M |
| A/R Days Reduction | $0 | $3.4M | $6.8M | $10.2M | $10.2M | $10.2M | $10.2M | $10.2M |
| Clean Claim Rate | $0 | $269K | $537K | $537K | $537K | $537K | $537K | $537K |
| Cumulative | $0 | $12.0M | $24.0M | $35.8M | $44.2M | $44.2M | $44.2M | $44.2M |
Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)
5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $44.2M is added at exit.
| Entry \ Exit | 9.0x | 10.0x | 11.0x | 11.5x | 12.0x |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8.0x | 63% / 11.4x | 67% / 13.1x | 71% / 14.7x | 73% / 15.5x | 75% / 16.4x |
| 9.0x | 58% / 9.8x | 62% / 11.3x | 66% / 12.7x | 68% / 13.4x | 70% / 14.2x |
| 10.0x | 53% / 8.5x | 58% / 9.8x | 62% / 11.1x | 64% / 11.8x | 66% / 12.4x |
| 11.0x | 49% / 7.4x | 54% / 8.6x | 58% / 9.8x | 60% / 10.4x | 62% / 11.0x |
| 12.0x | 46% / 6.5x | 50% / 7.6x | 54% / 8.7x | 56% / 9.3x | 58% / 9.8x |
Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)
Pro forma EBITDA can decline 30% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 4.6x, adding 3.9 turns of cushion.
5-Year Value Creation Waterfall
EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).
| Base EBITDA | RCM Uplift | Total | Margin | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Entry | $51.9M | — | $51.9M | 6.2% |
| Year 1 | $53.4M | +$29.4M | $82.9M | 9.9% |
| Year 2 | $55.0M | +$44.2M | $99.2M | 11.8% |
| Year 3 | $56.7M | +$44.2M | $100.8M | 12.0% |
| Year 4 | $58.4M | +$44.2M | $102.5M | 12.2% |
| Year 5 | $60.1M | +$44.2M | $104.3M | 12.4% |
Achievement Sensitivity
What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.
| Lever | 50% | 75% | 100% | 120% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost to Collect | $8.4M | $12.6M | $16.8M | $20.1M |
| Denial Rate Reductio | $8.3M | $12.5M | $16.6M | $19.9M |
| A/R Days Reduction | $5.1M | $7.7M | $10.2M | $12.3M |
| Clean Claim Rate | $269K | $403K | $537K | $645K |
| Total | $22.1M | $33.1M | $44.2M | $53.0M |
Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits
Key metrics vs 476 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.
| Metric | Hospital | P25 | P50 | P75 | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Op Margin | 6.2% | -15.0% | -4.5% | 4.1% | P80 |
| Net-to-Gross | 7.8% | 20.7% | 26.6% | 31.9% | P0 |
| Occupancy | 89.7% | 66.4% | 75.1% | 82.9% | P89 |
| Rev/Bed | $1.1M | $1.4M | $1.8M | $2.4M | P14 |
| Exp/Bed | $1.1M | $1.3M | $1.8M | $2.6M | P13 |
Bridge Methodology
Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.