Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — BRODSTONE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 04:02 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — BRODSTONE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL
CCN 281315 | NE | 25 beds | Current EBITDA $-1.5M → Pro Forma $310K (+$1.8M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$35.1M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-1.5M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.8M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$310K
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.3M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

63%
Realization (C)
$1.8M
Modeled Uplift
$1.2M
Risk-Adjusted
-$685K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 63% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Commercial Payer %, Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.2M (vs $1.8M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$702K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$695K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$427K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$22K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.8M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$702K$702K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$676K$19K$695K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$108K$319K$427K$1.3M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$22K$22K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT77.8% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$175K$351K$526K$702K$702K$702K$702K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$174K$347K$521K$695K$695K$695K$695K
A/R Days Reduction$0$142K$285K$427K$427K$427K$427K$427K
Clean Claim Rate$0$11K$22K$22K$22K$22K$22K$22K
Cumulative$0$503K$1.0M$1.5M$1.8M$1.8M$1.8M$1.8M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.8M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
-42.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
48.5x
Headroom (turns)
746%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 746% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to -42.0x, adding 141.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-1.5M$-1.5M-4.4%
Year 1$-1.6M+$1.2M$-352K-1.0%
Year 2$-1.6M+$1.8M$216K0.6%
Year 3$-1.7M+$1.8M$167K0.5%
Year 4$-1.7M+$1.8M$117K0.3%
Year 5$-1.8M+$1.8M$65K0.2%
$-15.4M
Entry EV (10x)
$716K
Exit EV (11x)
$16.1M
Value Created
$65K
Exit EBITDA
$-2.4M
Organic Growth
$18.5M
RCM Value Creation
$65K
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$351K$526K$702K$842K
Denial Rate Reductio$347K$521K$695K$834K
A/R Days Reduction$214K$320K$427K$512K
Clean Claim Rate$11K$17K$22K$27K
Total$923K$1.4M$1.8M$2.2M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 66 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-4.4%-12.9%-4.8%0.8%
P52
Net-to-Gross70.3%61.2%70.3%77.8%
P48
Occupancy22.3%11.6%18.2%25.7%
P65
Rev/Bed$1.4M$763K$1.3M$1.9M
P55
Exp/Bed$1.5M$789K$1.4M$2.1M
P56

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML