Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — REGIONAL WEST GARDEN COUNTY HOSPITAL 2026-04-27 08:37 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — REGIONAL WEST GARDEN COUNTY HOSPITAL
CCN 281310 | NE | 10 beds | Current EBITDA $-908K → Pro Forma $-394K (+$515K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
EBITDA BRIDGE  ·  CCN 281310

REGIONAL WEST GARDEN COUNTY HOSPITAL
value-creation walk.

7-lever RCM bridge from current EBITDA to pro-forma — denial / underpay / DAR / coding / contract / cost discipline / cash acceleration. Each lever shows current vs benchmark target with data provenance.

$9.7M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-908K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$515K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-394K
Pro Forma EBITDA
+533bps
Margin Improvement
$371K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

62%
Realization (C)
$515K
Modeled Uplift
$317K
Risk-Adjusted
-$198K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood

Expected realization: 62% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Commercial Payer %, Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.3M (vs $0.5M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$194K
+201bp
Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$193K
+200bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$118K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+10bp
Total EBITDA Impact$515K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$186K$8K$194K$012mo
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$193K$193K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$30K$88K$118K$371K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT80.7% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Denial Rate Reduction$0$49K$97K$146K$194K$194K$194K$194K
Cost to Collect$0$48K$97K$145K$193K$193K$193K$193K
A/R Days Reduction$0$39K$78K$118K$118K$118K$118K$118K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$141K$282K$418K$515K$515K$515K$515K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $515K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0x-100% / 0.0xLossLossLossLoss
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0xLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-908K$-908K-9.4%
Year 1$-936K+$343K$-592K-6.1%
Year 2$-964K+$515K$-449K-4.6%
Year 3$-993K+$515K$-478K-4.9%
Year 4$-1.0M+$515K$-508K-5.3%
Year 5$-1.1M+$515K$-538K-5.6%
$-9.1M
Entry EV (10x)
$-5.9M
Exit EV (11x)
$3.2M
Value Created
$-538K
Exit EBITDA
$-1.4M
Organic Growth
$5.1M
RCM Value Creation
$-538K
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Denial Rate Reductio$97K$146K$194K$233K
Cost to Collect$97K$145K$193K$232K
A/R Days Reduction$59K$88K$118K$141K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$257K$386K$515K$618K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 43 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-9.4%-13.7%-7.7%-1.6%
P42
Net-to-Gross71.8%69.3%72.7%80.7%
P40
Occupancy14.2%10.2%15.9%20.4%
P35
Rev/Bed$967K$767K$1.2M$1.7M
P35
Exp/Bed$1.1M$831K$1.3M$1.9M
P33

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML