Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — NEBRASKA ORTHOPAEDIC HOSPITAL LLC 2026-04-26 05:05 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — NEBRASKA ORTHOPAEDIC HOSPITAL LLC
CCN 280129 | NE | 24 beds | Current EBITDA $25.2M → Pro Forma $31.1M (+$5.9M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$112.1M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$25.2M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$5.9M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$31.1M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$4.3M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

63%
Realization (C)
$5.9M
Modeled Uplift
$3.7M
Risk-Adjusted
-$2.2M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 63% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Revenue per Bed, Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $3.7M (vs $5.9M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$2.2M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$2.2M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$1.4M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$72K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$5.9M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$2.2M$2.2M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$2.2M$62K$2.2M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$344K$1.0M$1.4M$4.3M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$72K$72K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT78.8% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$560K$1.1M$1.7M$2.2M$2.2M$2.2M$2.2M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$555K$1.1M$1.7M$2.2M$2.2M$2.2M$2.2M
A/R Days Reduction$0$455K$909K$1.4M$1.4M$1.4M$1.4M$1.4M
Clean Claim Rate$0$36K$72K$72K$72K$72K$72K$72K
Cumulative$0$1.6M$3.2M$4.8M$5.9M$5.9M$5.9M$5.9M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $5.9M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x47% / 6.9x52% / 8.1x56% / 9.2x58% / 9.8x60% / 10.3x
9.0x42% / 5.8x47% / 6.8x51% / 7.8x53% / 8.3x55% / 8.8x
10.0x37% / 4.9x42% / 5.8x46% / 6.7x48% / 7.2x50% / 7.6x
11.0x33% / 4.2x38% / 5.0x42% / 5.8x44% / 6.2x46% / 6.6x
12.0x29% / 3.5x34% / 4.3x38% / 5.0x40% / 5.4x42% / 5.8x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.9x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.4x
Headroom (turns)
-5%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -5% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.9x, adding 1.6 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$25.2M$25.2M22.5%
Year 1$26.0M+$3.9M$29.9M26.7%
Year 2$26.7M+$5.9M$32.6M29.1%
Year 3$27.5M+$5.9M$33.4M29.8%
Year 4$28.4M+$5.9M$34.3M30.6%
Year 5$29.2M+$5.9M$35.1M31.3%
$251.9M
Entry EV (10x)
$386.2M
Exit EV (11x)
$134.2M
Value Created
$35.1M
Exit EBITDA
$40.1M
Organic Growth
$59.0M
RCM Value Creation
$35.1M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$1.1M$1.7M$2.2M$2.7M
Denial Rate Reductio$1.1M$1.7M$2.2M$2.7M
A/R Days Reduction$682K$1.0M$1.4M$1.6M
Clean Claim Rate$36K$54K$72K$86K
Total$2.9M$4.4M$5.9M$7.1M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 66 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin22.5%-13.0%-5.0%0.8%
P94
Net-to-Gross41.5%62.2%71.1%78.8%
P6
Occupancy6.0%11.6%17.6%24.8%
P8
Rev/Bed$4.7M$763K$1.3M$1.8M
P98
Exp/Bed$3.6M$789K$1.4M$1.8M
P97

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML