Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — CHI HEALTH NEBRASKA HEART 2026-04-26 06:39 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — CHI HEALTH NEBRASKA HEART
CCN 280128 | NE | 63 beds | Current EBITDA $5.4M → Pro Forma $9.3M (+$3.9M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$74.4M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$5.4M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$3.9M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$9.3M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$2.9M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

62%
Realization (C)
$3.9M
Modeled Uplift
$2.4M
Risk-Adjusted
-$1.5M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 62% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $2.4M (vs $3.9M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$1.5M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$1.5M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$905K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$48K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$3.9M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$1.5M$1.5M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$1.4M$41K$1.5M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$228K$677K$905K$2.9M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$48K$48K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT42.5% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$372K$744K$1.1M$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$368K$736K$1.1M$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M
A/R Days Reduction$0$302K$603K$905K$905K$905K$905K$905K
Clean Claim Rate$0$24K$48K$48K$48K$48K$48K$48K
Cumulative$0$1.1M$2.1M$3.2M$3.9M$3.9M$3.9M$3.9M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $3.9M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x60% / 10.5x65% / 12.1x69% / 13.6x70% / 14.4x72% / 15.1x
9.0x55% / 9.0x60% / 10.4x64% / 11.7x65% / 12.4x67% / 13.1x
10.0x51% / 7.8x55% / 9.0x59% / 10.2x61% / 10.8x63% / 11.4x
11.0x47% / 6.8x51% / 7.9x55% / 9.0x57% / 9.6x59% / 10.1x
12.0x43% / 5.9x47% / 7.0x51% / 8.0x53% / 8.5x55% / 9.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
4.9x
Pro Forma Leverage
1.6x
Headroom (turns)
25%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 25% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 4.9x, adding 3.6 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$5.4M$5.4M7.3%
Year 1$5.6M+$2.6M$8.2M11.0%
Year 2$5.7M+$3.9M$9.6M13.0%
Year 3$5.9M+$3.9M$9.8M13.2%
Year 4$6.1M+$3.9M$10.0M13.4%
Year 5$6.3M+$3.9M$10.2M13.7%
$54.0M
Entry EV (10x)
$111.9M
Exit EV (11x)
$57.9M
Value Created
$10.2M
Exit EBITDA
$8.6M
Organic Growth
$39.1M
RCM Value Creation
$10.2M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$744K$1.1M$1.5M$1.8M
Denial Rate Reductio$736K$1.1M$1.5M$1.8M
A/R Days Reduction$453K$679K$905K$1.1M
Clean Claim Rate$24K$36K$48K$57K
Total$2.0M$2.9M$3.9M$4.7M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 19 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin7.3%-10.1%-8.8%7.2%
P74
Net-to-Gross32.8%29.7%37.4%42.5%
P37
Occupancy23.1%40.6%45.7%58.0%
P5
Rev/Bed$1.2M$1.6M$1.8M$2.6M
P16
Exp/Bed$1.1M$1.4M$2.0M$2.7M
P11

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML