Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — GREAT PLAINS HEALTH 2026-04-26 10:37 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — GREAT PLAINS HEALTH
CCN 280065 | NE | 96 beds | Current EBITDA $10.5M → Pro Forma $24.6M (+$14.1M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$268.8M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$10.5M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$14.1M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$24.6M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$10.3M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

71%
Realization (B)
$14.1M
Modeled Uplift
$10.0M
Risk-Adjusted
-$4.1M
Execution Discount
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution
Occupancy RateOccupancy Rate has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 71% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Revenue per Bed, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $10.0M (vs $14.1M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$5.4M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$5.3M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$3.3M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$172K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$14.1M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$5.4M$5.4M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$5.2M$148K$5.3M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$825K$2.4M$3.3M$10.3M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$172K$172K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT42.5% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.3M$2.7M$4.0M$5.4M$5.4M$5.4M$5.4M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.3M$2.7M$4.0M$5.3M$5.3M$5.3M$5.3M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.1M$2.2M$3.3M$3.3M$3.3M$3.3M$3.3M
Clean Claim Rate$0$86K$172K$172K$172K$172K$172K$172K
Cumulative$0$3.9M$7.7M$11.5M$14.1M$14.1M$14.1M$14.1M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $14.1M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x72% / 15.1x77% / 17.1x81% / 19.2x82% / 20.2x84% / 21.2x
9.0x67% / 13.1x72% / 14.9x76% / 16.7x77% / 17.6x79% / 18.5x
10.0x63% / 11.4x67% / 13.1x71% / 14.7x73% / 15.5x75% / 16.3x
11.0x59% / 10.1x63% / 11.6x67% / 13.1x69% / 13.8x71% / 14.5x
12.0x55% / 9.0x60% / 10.3x64% / 11.7x65% / 12.4x67% / 13.1x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
3.6x
Pro Forma Leverage
2.9x
Headroom (turns)
45%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 45% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 3.6x, adding 4.9 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$10.5M$10.5M3.9%
Year 1$10.8M+$9.4M$20.2M7.5%
Year 2$11.1M+$14.1M$25.3M9.4%
Year 3$11.5M+$14.1M$25.6M9.5%
Year 4$11.8M+$14.1M$25.9M9.6%
Year 5$12.1M+$14.1M$26.3M9.8%
$104.8M
Entry EV (10x)
$289.2M
Exit EV (11x)
$184.4M
Value Created
$26.3M
Exit EBITDA
$16.7M
Organic Growth
$141.4M
RCM Value Creation
$26.3M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$2.7M$4.0M$5.4M$6.5M
Denial Rate Reductio$2.7M$4.0M$5.3M$6.4M
A/R Days Reduction$1.6M$2.5M$3.3M$3.9M
Clean Claim Rate$86K$129K$172K$206K
Total$7.1M$10.6M$14.1M$17.0M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 22 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin3.9%-10.4%-8.8%2.6%
P73
Net-to-Gross38.6%29.8%37.2%42.5%
P59
Occupancy52.7%40.9%46.7%60.1%
P55
Rev/Bed$2.8M$1.2M$1.7M$2.6M
P91
Exp/Bed$2.7M$1.4M$1.9M$2.8M
P68

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML