Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ADVANCED CARE HOSPITAL OF MONTANA 2026-04-26 07:43 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ADVANCED CARE HOSPITAL OF MONTANA
CCN 272001 | MT | 40 beds | Current EBITDA $3.7M → Pro Forma $5.1M (+$1.3M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$25.5M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$3.7M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.3M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$5.1M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$978K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

73%
Realization (B)
$1.3M
Modeled Uplift
$983K
Risk-Adjusted
-$358K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli

Expected realization: 73% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Commercial Payer %. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.0M (vs $1.3M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$510K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$505K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$310K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$16K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.3M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$510K$510K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$491K$14K$505K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$78K$232K$310K$978K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$16K$16K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT87.8% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$128K$255K$383K$510K$510K$510K$510K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$126K$252K$379K$505K$505K$505K$505K
A/R Days Reduction$0$103K$207K$310K$310K$310K$310K$310K
Clean Claim Rate$0$8K$16K$16K$16K$16K$16K$16K
Cumulative$0$365K$731K$1.1M$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.3M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x51% / 7.9x56% / 9.1x60% / 10.3x61% / 10.9x63% / 11.6x
9.0x46% / 6.6x51% / 7.7x55% / 8.8x56% / 9.4x58% / 9.9x
10.0x41% / 5.6x46% / 6.6x50% / 7.6x52% / 8.1x54% / 8.6x
11.0x37% / 4.8x42% / 5.7x46% / 6.6x48% / 7.1x50% / 7.5x
12.0x33% / 4.2x38% / 5.0x42% / 5.8x44% / 6.2x46% / 6.6x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.2x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.3x
Headroom (turns)
4%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 4% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.2x, adding 2.2 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$3.7M$3.7M14.6%
Year 1$3.8M+$895K$4.7M18.5%
Year 2$3.9M+$1.3M$5.3M20.7%
Year 3$4.1M+$1.3M$5.4M21.2%
Year 4$4.2M+$1.3M$5.5M21.7%
Year 5$4.3M+$1.3M$5.7M22.2%
$37.2M
Entry EV (10x)
$62.2M
Exit EV (11x)
$25.0M
Value Created
$5.7M
Exit EBITDA
$5.9M
Organic Growth
$13.4M
RCM Value Creation
$5.7M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$255K$383K$510K$612K
Denial Rate Reductio$252K$379K$505K$606K
A/R Days Reduction$155K$233K$310K$372K
Clean Claim Rate$8K$12K$16K$20K
Total$671K$1.0M$1.3M$1.6M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 43 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin14.6%-21.2%-7.9%-1.3%
P93
Net-to-Gross64.2%63.8%73.9%87.8%
P32
Occupancy83.6%25.5%60.8%73.8%
P91
Rev/Bed$638K$339K$598K$2.0M
P54
Exp/Bed$545K$384K$605K$2.4M
P42

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML