Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — BILLINGS CLINIC BROADWATER 2026-04-26 05:02 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — BILLINGS CLINIC BROADWATER
CCN 271333 | MT | 25 beds | Current EBITDA $-945K → Pro Forma $-437K (+$508K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$9.5M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-945K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$508K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-437K
Pro Forma EBITDA
+533bps
Margin Improvement
$366K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

70%
Realization (C)
$508K
Modeled Uplift
$353K
Risk-Adjusted
-$155K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood

Expected realization: 69% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Commercial Payer %. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.4M (vs $0.5M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$192K
+201bp
Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$191K
+200bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$116K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+10bp
Total EBITDA Impact$508K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$183K$8K$192K$012mo
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$191K$191K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$29K$87K$116K$366K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT87.7% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Denial Rate Reduction$0$48K$96K$144K$192K$192K$192K$192K
Cost to Collect$0$48K$95K$143K$191K$191K$191K$191K
A/R Days Reduction$0$39K$77K$116K$116K$116K$116K$116K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$139K$278K$412K$508K$508K$508K$508K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $508K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0x-100% / 0.0xLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-945K$-945K-9.9%
Year 1$-973K+$339K$-635K-6.7%
Year 2$-1.0M+$508K$-495K-5.2%
Year 3$-1.0M+$508K$-525K-5.5%
Year 4$-1.1M+$508K$-556K-5.8%
Year 5$-1.1M+$508K$-588K-6.2%
$-9.5M
Entry EV (10x)
$-6.5M
Exit EV (11x)
$3.0M
Value Created
$-588K
Exit EBITDA
$-1.5M
Organic Growth
$5.1M
RCM Value Creation
$-588K
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Denial Rate Reductio$96K$144K$192K$230K
Cost to Collect$95K$143K$191K$229K
A/R Days Reduction$58K$87K$116K$139K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$254K$381K$508K$609K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 49 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-9.9%-20.4%-9.1%-1.4%
P38
Net-to-Gross76.2%63.3%72.9%87.7%
P62
Occupancy66.9%22.7%55.9%73.2%
P67
Rev/Bed$381K$365K$709K$1.9M
P26
Exp/Bed$419K$419K$953K$2.2M
P24

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML