Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — HEALTHCENTER NORTHWEST 2026-04-26 09:05 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — HEALTHCENTER NORTHWEST
CCN 270087 | MT | 17 beds | Current EBITDA $16.1M → Pro Forma $19.6M (+$3.5M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$67.2M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$16.1M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$3.5M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$19.6M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$2.6M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

62%
Realization (C)
$3.5M
Modeled Uplift
$2.2M
Risk-Adjusted
-$1.3M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 62% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Revenue per Bed, Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $2.2M (vs $3.5M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$1.3M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$1.3M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$817K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$43K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$3.5M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$1.3M$1.3M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$1.3M$37K$1.3M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$206K$611K$817K$2.6M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$43K$43K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT88.3% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$336K$672K$1.0M$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$333K$665K$998K$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M
A/R Days Reduction$0$272K$545K$817K$817K$817K$817K$817K
Clean Claim Rate$0$21K$43K$43K$43K$43K$43K$43K
Cumulative$0$962K$1.9M$2.9M$3.5M$3.5M$3.5M$3.5M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $3.5M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x47% / 6.8x51% / 8.0x55% / 9.1x57% / 9.6x59% / 10.2x
9.0x42% / 5.7x46% / 6.7x50% / 7.7x52% / 8.2x54% / 8.7x
10.0x37% / 4.8x42% / 5.7x46% / 6.6x48% / 7.1x50% / 7.5x
11.0x33% / 4.1x37% / 4.9x42% / 5.7x44% / 6.1x46% / 6.5x
12.0x28% / 3.5x33% / 4.2x38% / 5.0x40% / 5.3x42% / 5.7x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.9x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.4x
Headroom (turns)
-7%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -7% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.9x, adding 1.5 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$16.1M$16.1M24.0%
Year 1$16.6M+$2.4M$18.9M28.2%
Year 2$17.1M+$3.5M$20.6M30.7%
Year 3$17.6M+$3.5M$21.1M31.4%
Year 4$18.1M+$3.5M$21.6M32.2%
Year 5$18.7M+$3.5M$22.2M33.0%
$160.9M
Entry EV (10x)
$244.1M
Exit EV (11x)
$83.2M
Value Created
$22.2M
Exit EBITDA
$25.6M
Organic Growth
$35.3M
RCM Value Creation
$22.2M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$672K$1.0M$1.3M$1.6M
Denial Rate Reductio$665K$998K$1.3M$1.6M
A/R Days Reduction$409K$613K$817K$981K
Clean Claim Rate$21K$32K$43K$52K
Total$1.8M$2.7M$3.5M$4.2M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 49 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin24.0%-21.6%-9.5%-2.7%
P98
Net-to-Gross48.2%63.3%73.4%88.3%
P6
Occupancy6.0%23.2%52.3%71.2%
P0
Rev/Bed$4.0M$365K$760K$1.9M
P91
Exp/Bed$3.0M$419K$960K$2.2M
P84

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML