Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — GREAT FALLS CLINIC MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 05:01 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — GREAT FALLS CLINIC MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 270086 | MT | 20 beds | Current EBITDA $27.8M → Pro Forma $34.7M (+$6.9M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$132.1M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$27.8M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$6.9M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$34.7M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$5.1M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

80%
Realization (B)
$6.9M
Modeled Uplift
$5.6M
Risk-Adjusted
-$1.4M
Execution Discount
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 80% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Revenue per Bed, Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $5.6M (vs $6.9M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$2.6M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$2.6M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$1.6M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$85K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$6.9M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$2.6M$2.6M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$2.5M$73K$2.6M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$405K$1.2M$1.6M$5.1M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$85K$85K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT88.1% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$661K$1.3M$2.0M$2.6M$2.6M$2.6M$2.6M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$654K$1.3M$2.0M$2.6M$2.6M$2.6M$2.6M
A/R Days Reduction$0$536K$1.1M$1.6M$1.6M$1.6M$1.6M$1.6M
Clean Claim Rate$0$42K$85K$85K$85K$85K$85K$85K
Cumulative$0$1.9M$3.8M$5.6M$6.9M$6.9M$6.9M$6.9M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $6.9M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x48% / 7.1x52% / 8.2x56% / 9.3x58% / 9.9x60% / 10.5x
9.0x43% / 5.9x47% / 6.9x51% / 8.0x53% / 8.5x55% / 9.0x
10.0x38% / 5.0x43% / 5.9x47% / 6.8x49% / 7.3x51% / 7.8x
11.0x34% / 4.2x38% / 5.1x43% / 5.9x45% / 6.3x46% / 6.8x
12.0x29% / 3.6x34% / 4.4x39% / 5.2x41% / 5.5x43% / 5.9x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.8x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.3x
Headroom (turns)
-4%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -4% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.8x, adding 1.7 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$27.8M$27.8M21.0%
Year 1$28.6M+$4.6M$33.3M25.2%
Year 2$29.5M+$6.9M$36.4M27.6%
Year 3$30.4M+$6.9M$37.3M28.2%
Year 4$31.3M+$6.9M$38.2M28.9%
Year 5$32.2M+$6.9M$39.2M29.6%
$277.9M
Entry EV (10x)
$430.8M
Exit EV (11x)
$152.9M
Value Created
$39.2M
Exit EBITDA
$44.3M
Organic Growth
$69.5M
RCM Value Creation
$39.2M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$1.3M$2.0M$2.6M$3.2M
Denial Rate Reductio$1.3M$2.0M$2.6M$3.1M
A/R Days Reduction$804K$1.2M$1.6M$1.9M
Clean Claim Rate$42K$63K$85K$101K
Total$3.5M$5.2M$6.9M$8.3M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 50 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin21.0%-21.4%-9.3%-1.5%
P94
Net-to-Gross33.0%63.6%73.2%88.1%
P0
Occupancy74.8%23.2%54.1%72.7%
P80
Rev/Bed$6.6M$373K$734K$1.9M
P98
Exp/Bed$5.2M$423K$957K$2.2M
P98

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML