Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ST VINCENT HEALTHCARE 2026-04-26 08:03 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ST VINCENT HEALTHCARE
CCN 270049 | MT | 226 beds | Current EBITDA $-101.0M → Pro Forma $-72.1M (+$28.9M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$549.8M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-101.0M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$28.9M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-72.1M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$21.1M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

72%
Realization (B)
$28.9M
Modeled Uplift
$20.9M
Risk-Adjusted
-$8.0M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 72% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risks: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $20.9M (vs $28.9M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$11.0M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$10.9M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$6.7M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$352K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$28.9M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$11.0M$11.0M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$10.6M$302K$10.9M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.7M$5.0M$6.7M$21.1M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$352K$352K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT34.5% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$2.7M$5.5M$8.2M$11.0M$11.0M$11.0M$11.0M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$2.7M$5.4M$8.2M$10.9M$10.9M$10.9M$10.9M
A/R Days Reduction$0$2.2M$4.5M$6.7M$6.7M$6.7M$6.7M$6.7M
Clean Claim Rate$0$176K$352K$352K$352K$352K$352K$352K
Cumulative$0$7.9M$15.8M$23.5M$28.9M$28.9M$28.9M$28.9M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $28.9M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-101.0M$-101.0M-18.4%
Year 1$-104.1M+$19.3M$-84.8M-15.4%
Year 2$-107.2M+$28.9M$-78.3M-14.2%
Year 3$-110.4M+$28.9M$-81.5M-14.8%
Year 4$-113.7M+$28.9M$-84.8M-15.4%
Year 5$-117.1M+$28.9M$-88.2M-16.0%
$-1.01B
Entry EV (10x)
$-970.2M
Exit EV (11x)
$40.1M
Value Created
$-88.2M
Exit EBITDA
$-160.9M
Organic Growth
$289.3M
RCM Value Creation
$-88.2M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$5.5M$8.2M$11.0M$13.2M
Denial Rate Reductio$5.4M$8.2M$10.9M$13.1M
A/R Days Reduction$3.3M$5.0M$6.7M$8.0M
Clean Claim Rate$176K$264K$352K$422K
Total$14.5M$21.7M$28.9M$34.7M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 9 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-18.4%-16.1%-10.8%-5.3%
P0
Net-to-Gross37.6%40.4%46.5%52.8%
P0
Occupancy70.8%56.8%62.1%68.9%
P78
Rev/Bed$2.4M$1.7M$2.3M$2.6M
P56
Exp/Bed$2.9M$1.8M$2.6M$2.9M
P67

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML