Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — OSAGE BEACH CENTER FOR COGNITIVE DIS 2026-04-26 19:01 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — OSAGE BEACH CENTER FOR COGNITIVE DIS
CCN 264031 | MO | 16 beds | Current EBITDA $539K → Pro Forma $801K (+$262K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$4.7M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$539K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$262K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$801K
Pro Forma EBITDA
+552bps
Margin Improvement
$182K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

73%
Realization (B)
$262K
Modeled Uplift
$190K
Risk-Adjusted
-$71K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 73% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Bed Count. Risks: Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.2M (vs $0.3M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$100K
+210bp
Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$95K
+200bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$58K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+20bp
Total EBITDA Impact$262K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$91K$8K$100K$012mo
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$95K$95K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$15K$43K$58K$182K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT52.3% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Denial Rate Reduction$0$25K$50K$75K$100K$100K$100K$100K
Cost to Collect$0$24K$47K$71K$95K$95K$95K$95K
A/R Days Reduction$0$19K$38K$58K$58K$58K$58K$58K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$73K$145K$213K$262K$262K$262K$262K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $262K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x54% / 8.8x59% / 10.1x63% / 11.4x65% / 12.1x66% / 12.8x
9.0x49% / 7.4x54% / 8.6x58% / 9.8x60% / 10.4x62% / 11.0x
10.0x45% / 6.4x49% / 7.4x53% / 8.5x55% / 9.0x57% / 9.6x
11.0x41% / 5.5x45% / 6.5x49% / 7.4x51% / 7.9x53% / 8.4x
12.0x37% / 4.8x41% / 5.7x46% / 6.5x48% / 7.0x49% / 7.4x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.7x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.8x
Headroom (turns)
12%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 12% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.7x, adding 2.8 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$539K$539K11.4%
Year 1$556K+$174K$730K15.4%
Year 2$572K+$262K$834K17.6%
Year 3$589K+$262K$851K18.0%
Year 4$607K+$262K$869K18.3%
Year 5$625K+$262K$887K18.7%
$5.4M
Entry EV (10x)
$9.8M
Exit EV (11x)
$4.4M
Value Created
$887K
Exit EBITDA
$859K
Organic Growth
$2.6M
RCM Value Creation
$887K
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Denial Rate Reductio$50K$75K$100K$119K
Cost to Collect$47K$71K$95K$114K
A/R Days Reduction$29K$43K$58K$69K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$131K$196K$262K$314K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 42 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin11.4%-17.7%-9.4%-0.7%
P93
Net-to-Gross42.9%35.4%42.2%52.3%
P50
Occupancy83.7%19.8%31.4%43.5%
P95
Rev/Bed$296K$639K$987K$1.8M
P5
Exp/Bed$263K$748K$1.1M$1.8M
P5

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML