Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ST. LOUIS FORENSIC TREATMENT CENTER 2026-04-26 07:37 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ST. LOUIS FORENSIC TREATMENT CENTER
CCN 264010 | MO | 255 beds | Current EBITDA $-36.9M → Pro Forma $-34.5M (+$2.4M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$45.0M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-36.9M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$2.4M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-34.5M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.7M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

72%
Realization (B)
$2.4M
Modeled Uplift
$1.7M
Risk-Adjusted
-$662K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Payer DiversityHigher Payer Diversity increases execution likelih

Expected realization: 72% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Payer Diversity. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.7M (vs $2.4M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$901K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$892K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$548K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$29K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$2.4M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$901K$901K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$867K$25K$892K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$138K$410K$548K$1.7M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$29K$29K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT29.4% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$225K$450K$676K$901K$901K$901K$901K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$223K$446K$669K$892K$892K$892K$892K
A/R Days Reduction$0$183K$365K$548K$548K$548K$548K$548K
Clean Claim Rate$0$14K$29K$29K$29K$29K$29K$29K
Cumulative$0$645K$1.3M$1.9M$2.4M$2.4M$2.4M$2.4M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $2.4M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-36.9M$-36.9M-81.9%
Year 1$-38.0M+$1.6M$-36.4M-80.9%
Year 2$-39.1M+$2.4M$-36.8M-81.6%
Year 3$-40.3M+$2.4M$-37.9M-84.2%
Year 4$-41.5M+$2.4M$-39.2M-86.9%
Year 5$-42.8M+$2.4M$-40.4M-89.7%
$-368.9M
Entry EV (10x)
$-444.4M
Exit EV (11x)
$-75.5M
Value Created
$-40.4M
Exit EBITDA
$-58.8M
Organic Growth
$23.7M
RCM Value Creation
$-40.4M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$450K$676K$901K$1.1M
Denial Rate Reductio$446K$669K$892K$1.1M
A/R Days Reduction$274K$411K$548K$658K
Clean Claim Rate$14K$22K$29K$35K
Total$1.2M$1.8M$2.4M$2.8M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 35 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-50.0%-12.5%-3.1%4.1%
P0
Net-to-Gross65.5%22.7%26.3%29.4%
P94
Occupancy93.8%48.2%65.9%72.9%
P97
Rev/Bed$177K$1.1M$1.4M$1.6M
P0
Exp/Bed$321K$1.0M$1.4M$1.6M
P3

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML