Corpus Intelligence ML Analysis — ST. LOUIS FORENSIC TREATMENT CENTER 2026-04-26 12:32 UTC
ML Analysis — ST. LOUIS FORENSIC TREATMENT CENTER
CCN 264010 | Clustering + Distress + RCM Opportunity
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.

Investability Score

Hold / Selective — investigate specific opportunities but be prepared for execution risk.

53
/ 100 (C)
Financial Health3/25
RCM Upside20/25
Market Position15/20
Demand Defensibility11/15
Operational Efficiency4/15
Entry Multiple: 8.0x – 10.0x
Est. MOIC: 1.9x
Risk Factors:
  • Negative operating margin
  • Expenses exceed revenue
Catalysts:
  • RCM optimization could add 3-5pp margin
  • Strong commercial payer base protects revenue
  • Limited competition supports pricing power

Margin Prediction (Trained Ridge Model)

-13.2%
R²=0.34 | n=4,907 | Grade B | Actual: -50.0%

Ridge regression trained on 4,907 HCRIS hospitals. 90% CI: [-41.5%, 15.1%]. P31 nationally.

DriverValueEffectExplanation
Revenue/Bed176634.651-0.1958
Lower Revenue/Bed decreases predicted margin
Expense/Bed321306.514+0.1646
Higher Expense/Bed increases predicted margin
Reimbursement Quality0.633-0.1243
Higher Reimbursement Quality decreases predicted m
Net-to-Gross0.655+0.0322
Higher Net-to-Gross increases predicted margin
Occupancy × Net-to-Gross0.615+0.0320
Higher Occupancy × Net-to-Gross increases predicte
Turnaround: 28%Low turnaround probability (28%). Structural disadvantages in Revenue/Bed and Expense/Bed.
Under-Performing / Distre
Archetype
42.6%
Distress Risk
$0
RCM Opportunity
D
Opportunity Grade
-50.0%
Projected Margin

Cluster: Under-Performing / Distressed

Percentile within cluster: P99. Deeply negative margins signal severe distress. Evaluate asset-level acquisition at 4-6x normalized EBITDA.

Nearest Peers

HospitalStateBeds
HOLY FAMILY MEMORIAL INCWI58
MIDDLESBORO ARHKY46
ATRIUM HEALTH NAVICENT BALDWINGA86
BON SECOURS COMMUNITY HOSPITALNY98
ADVANCED SPECIALTY HOSP. OF TOLEDOOH40
COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER BRANCHMI75

Distress Analysis

Risk: Elevated
National distress rate: 49.3%
MO distress rate: 53.0%
Model AUC: 0.629
FactorValueContributionDirection
Occupancy Rate0.938-0.383▼ risk
Net To Gross Ratio0.655+0.128▲ risk
Revenue Per Bed176634.651+0.083▲ risk
Medicaid Day Pct0.032-0.057▼ risk
Medicare Day Pct0.001-0.056▼ risk
Beds255.000+0.014▲ risk

RCM Improvement Opportunity

Total (risk-adjusted): $0
Current margin: -50.0%
Projected margin: -50.0%
Grade: D
Comps: 34

Gap analysis vs P75 peers with 60% closure assumption. Confidence-weighted by lever implementation difficulty.

LeverCurrentBenchmarkGapImpactConfidenceTimeline

Predicted RCM Performance (Public Data Only)

A
RCM Grade

Strong RCM profile — likely low-risk from an operations perspective. Focus diligence on growth thesis.

MetricPredicted90% CIPercentileAssessment
Denial Rate2.0%[2.0%, 25.0%]P0Strong — predicted denial rate is in the top third nationall
Days in AR25.0[25.0, 75.0]P0Strong — predicted days in ar is in the top third nationally
Clean Claim Rate98.0%[80.0%, 98.0%]P0Strong — predicted clean claim rate is in the top third.
Net Collection Rate99.5%[90.0%, 99.5%]P8Strong — predicted net collection rate is in the top third.