Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ST. LUKES REHAB HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 21:54 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ST. LUKES REHAB HOSPITAL
CCN 263030 | MO | 35 beds | Current EBITDA $5.0M → Pro Forma $6.0M (+$1.0M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$19.9M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$5.0M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.0M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$6.0M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$763K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

75%
Realization (B)
$1.0M
Modeled Uplift
$782K
Risk-Adjusted
-$264K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 75% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Commercial Payer %. Risks: Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.8M (vs $1.0M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$398K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$394K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$242K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$13K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.0M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$398K$398K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$383K$11K$394K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$61K$181K$242K$763K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$13K$13K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT49.3% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$99K$199K$298K$398K$398K$398K$398K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$98K$197K$295K$394K$394K$394K$394K
A/R Days Reduction$0$81K$161K$242K$242K$242K$242K$242K
Clean Claim Rate$0$6K$13K$13K$13K$13K$13K$13K
Cumulative$0$285K$570K$848K$1.0M$1.0M$1.0M$1.0M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.0M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x47% / 6.8x51% / 7.9x55% / 9.0x57% / 9.6x59% / 10.1x
9.0x41% / 5.7x46% / 6.6x50% / 7.6x52% / 8.1x54% / 8.6x
10.0x37% / 4.8x41% / 5.7x46% / 6.5x48% / 7.0x49% / 7.4x
11.0x32% / 4.0x37% / 4.8x41% / 5.7x43% / 6.1x45% / 6.5x
12.0x28% / 3.4x33% / 4.2x37% / 4.9x40% / 5.3x41% / 5.7x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
7.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.5x
Headroom (turns)
-8%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -8% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 7.0x, adding 1.5 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$5.0M$5.0M25.0%
Year 1$5.1M+$698K$5.8M29.3%
Year 2$5.3M+$1.0M$6.3M31.8%
Year 3$5.4M+$1.0M$6.5M32.6%
Year 4$5.6M+$1.0M$6.6M33.4%
Year 5$5.8M+$1.0M$6.8M34.2%
$49.7M
Entry EV (10x)
$74.9M
Exit EV (11x)
$25.2M
Value Created
$6.8M
Exit EBITDA
$7.9M
Organic Growth
$10.5M
RCM Value Creation
$6.8M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$199K$298K$398K$477K
Denial Rate Reductio$197K$295K$394K$473K
A/R Days Reduction$121K$182K$242K$290K
Clean Claim Rate$6K$10K$13K$15K
Total$523K$785K$1.0M$1.3M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 64 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin25.0%-17.1%-9.3%2.9%
P95
Net-to-Gross51.9%31.4%37.0%49.3%
P78
Occupancy80.3%21.3%37.4%60.0%
P91
Rev/Bed$568K$582K$1.0M$1.8M
P23
Exp/Bed$426K$692K$1.0M$1.8M
P12

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML