Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — MERCY HOSPITAL CARTHAGE 2026-04-26 09:35 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — MERCY HOSPITAL CARTHAGE
CCN 261338 | MO | 25 beds | Current EBITDA $4.6M → Pro Forma $7.7M (+$3.1M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$58.4M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$4.6M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$3.1M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$7.7M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$2.2M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

72%
Realization (B)
$3.1M
Modeled Uplift
$2.2M
Risk-Adjusted
-$859K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 72% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $2.2M (vs $3.1M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$1.2M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$1.2M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$711K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$37K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$3.1M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$1.2M$1.2M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$1.1M$32K$1.2M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$179K$531K$711K$2.2M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$37K$37K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT49.9% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$292K$584K$876K$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$289K$578K$867K$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M
A/R Days Reduction$0$237K$474K$711K$711K$711K$711K$711K
Clean Claim Rate$0$19K$37K$37K$37K$37K$37K$37K
Cumulative$0$837K$1.7M$2.5M$3.1M$3.1M$3.1M$3.1M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $3.1M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x59% / 10.1x63% / 11.6x67% / 13.1x69% / 13.8x71% / 14.6x
9.0x54% / 8.6x58% / 10.0x62% / 11.3x64% / 11.9x66% / 12.6x
10.0x49% / 7.5x54% / 8.6x58% / 9.8x60% / 10.4x62% / 11.0x
11.0x45% / 6.5x50% / 7.6x54% / 8.6x56% / 9.2x58% / 9.7x
12.0x41% / 5.7x46% / 6.7x50% / 7.7x52% / 8.2x54% / 8.6x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.1x
Pro Forma Leverage
1.4x
Headroom (turns)
22%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 22% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.1x, adding 3.4 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$4.6M$4.6M7.9%
Year 1$4.7M+$2.0M$6.8M11.6%
Year 2$4.9M+$3.1M$7.9M13.6%
Year 3$5.0M+$3.1M$8.1M13.8%
Year 4$5.2M+$3.1M$8.2M14.1%
Year 5$5.3M+$3.1M$8.4M14.4%
$45.9M
Entry EV (10x)
$92.3M
Exit EV (11x)
$46.4M
Value Created
$8.4M
Exit EBITDA
$7.3M
Organic Growth
$30.7M
RCM Value Creation
$8.4M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$584K$876K$1.2M$1.4M
Denial Rate Reductio$578K$867K$1.2M$1.4M
A/R Days Reduction$355K$533K$711K$853K
Clean Claim Rate$19K$28K$37K$45K
Total$1.5M$2.3M$3.1M$3.7M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 62 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin7.9%-17.7%-9.7%-0.7%
P85
Net-to-Gross31.8%33.3%39.7%49.9%
P19
Occupancy59.8%20.5%32.8%53.1%
P77
Rev/Bed$2.3M$573K$987K$1.7M
P84
Exp/Bed$2.2M$661K$1.0M$1.8M
P82

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML