Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — NORTH KANSAS CITY HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 05:01 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — NORTH KANSAS CITY HOSPITAL
CCN 260096 | MO | 383 beds | Current EBITDA $46.5M → Pro Forma $78.2M (+$31.6M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$601.5M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$46.5M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$31.6M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$78.2M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$23.1M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

66%
Realization (C)
$31.6M
Modeled Uplift
$21.0M
Risk-Adjusted
-$10.6M
Execution Discount
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 67% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $21.0M (vs $31.6M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$12.0M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$11.9M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$7.3M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$385K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$31.6M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$12.0M$12.0M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$11.6M$331K$11.9M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.8M$5.5M$7.3M$23.1M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$385K$385K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT29.5% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$3.0M$6.0M$9.0M$12.0M$12.0M$12.0M$12.0M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$3.0M$6.0M$8.9M$11.9M$11.9M$11.9M$11.9M
A/R Days Reduction$0$2.4M$4.9M$7.3M$7.3M$7.3M$7.3M$7.3M
Clean Claim Rate$0$192K$385K$385K$385K$385K$385K$385K
Cumulative$0$8.6M$17.2M$25.7M$31.6M$31.6M$31.6M$31.6M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $31.6M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x59% / 10.2x64% / 11.7x68% / 13.2x69% / 13.9x71% / 14.7x
9.0x54% / 8.7x59% / 10.0x63% / 11.4x64% / 12.0x66% / 12.7x
10.0x50% / 7.5x54% / 8.7x58% / 9.9x60% / 10.5x62% / 11.1x
11.0x46% / 6.5x50% / 7.6x54% / 8.7x56% / 9.2x58% / 9.8x
12.0x42% / 5.7x46% / 6.7x50% / 7.7x52% / 8.2x54% / 8.7x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
1.5x
Headroom (turns)
23%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 23% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.0x, adding 3.4 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$46.5M$46.5M7.7%
Year 1$47.9M+$21.1M$69.0M11.5%
Year 2$49.3M+$31.6M$81.0M13.5%
Year 3$50.8M+$31.6M$82.5M13.7%
Year 4$52.4M+$31.6M$84.0M14.0%
Year 5$53.9M+$31.6M$85.6M14.2%
$465.1M
Entry EV (10x)
$941.2M
Exit EV (11x)
$476.1M
Value Created
$85.6M
Exit EBITDA
$74.1M
Organic Growth
$316.4M
RCM Value Creation
$85.6M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$6.0M$9.0M$12.0M$14.4M
Denial Rate Reductio$6.0M$8.9M$11.9M$14.3M
A/R Days Reduction$3.7M$5.5M$7.3M$8.8M
Clean Claim Rate$192K$289K$385K$462K
Total$15.8M$23.7M$31.6M$38.0M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 30 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin7.7%-12.2%-2.6%4.7%
P83
Net-to-Gross24.3%22.7%26.9%29.5%
P37
Occupancy57.0%52.1%66.1%75.5%
P37
Rev/Bed$1.6M$1.1M$1.5M$1.9M
P57
Exp/Bed$1.4M$1.1M$1.5M$1.8M
P40

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML