Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — CAPITAL REGION MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 05:04 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — CAPITAL REGION MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 260047 | MO | 100 beds | Current EBITDA $-39.7M → Pro Forma $-28.0M (+$11.8M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$224.0M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-39.7M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$11.8M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-28.0M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$8.6M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

67%
Realization (C)
$11.8M
Modeled Uplift
$7.9M
Risk-Adjusted
-$3.8M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 67% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Revenue per Bed. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $7.9M (vs $11.8M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$4.5M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$4.4M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$2.7M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$143K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$11.8M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$4.5M$4.5M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$4.3M$123K$4.4M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$687K$2.0M$2.7M$8.6M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$143K$143K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT43.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.1M$2.2M$3.4M$4.5M$4.5M$4.5M$4.5M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.1M$2.2M$3.3M$4.4M$4.4M$4.4M$4.4M
A/R Days Reduction$0$909K$1.8M$2.7M$2.7M$2.7M$2.7M$2.7M
Clean Claim Rate$0$72K$143K$143K$143K$143K$143K$143K
Cumulative$0$3.2M$6.4M$9.6M$11.8M$11.8M$11.8M$11.8M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $11.8M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-39.7M$-39.7M-17.7%
Year 1$-40.9M+$7.9M$-33.1M-14.8%
Year 2$-42.2M+$11.8M$-30.4M-13.6%
Year 3$-43.4M+$11.8M$-31.6M-14.1%
Year 4$-44.7M+$11.8M$-32.9M-14.7%
Year 5$-46.1M+$11.8M$-34.3M-15.3%
$-397.4M
Entry EV (10x)
$-377.2M
Exit EV (11x)
$20.3M
Value Created
$-34.3M
Exit EBITDA
$-63.3M
Organic Growth
$117.8M
RCM Value Creation
$-34.3M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$2.2M$3.4M$4.5M$5.4M
Denial Rate Reductio$2.2M$3.3M$4.4M$5.3M
A/R Days Reduction$1.4M$2.0M$2.7M$3.3M
Clean Claim Rate$72K$108K$143K$172K
Total$5.9M$8.8M$11.8M$14.1M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 43 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-17.7%-17.0%-1.3%10.3%
P23
Net-to-Gross29.6%23.1%29.2%43.0%
P53
Occupancy45.1%46.4%64.3%74.8%
P19
Rev/Bed$2.2M$382K$1.1M$1.5M
P91
Exp/Bed$2.6M$411K$1.1M$1.6M
P91

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML