Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — SSH - BELHAVEN 2026-04-26 09:26 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — SSH - BELHAVEN
CCN 252003 | MS | 36 beds | Current EBITDA $579K → Pro Forma $1.6M (+$1.0M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$19.8M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$579K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.0M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$1.6M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$761K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

76%
Realization (B)
$1.0M
Modeled Uplift
$788K
Risk-Adjusted
-$256K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like

Expected realization: 75% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Bed Count. Risks: Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.8M (vs $1.0M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$397K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$393K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$241K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$13K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.0M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$397K$397K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$382K$11K$393K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$61K$181K$241K$761K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$13K$13K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT56.6% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$99K$198K$298K$397K$397K$397K$397K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$98K$196K$295K$393K$393K$393K$393K
A/R Days Reduction$0$80K$161K$241K$241K$241K$241K$241K
Clean Claim Rate$0$6K$13K$13K$13K$13K$13K$13K
Cumulative$0$284K$568K$846K$1.0M$1.0M$1.0M$1.0M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.0M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x79% / 18.4x84% / 20.8x88% / 23.2x89% / 24.4x91% / 25.6x
9.0x74% / 16.0x79% / 18.1x83% / 20.3x84% / 21.4x86% / 22.4x
10.0x70% / 14.1x74% / 16.0x78% / 17.9x80% / 18.9x82% / 19.9x
11.0x66% / 12.5x70% / 14.2x74% / 16.0x76% / 16.9x78% / 17.8x
12.0x62% / 11.2x66% / 12.8x70% / 14.4x72% / 15.2x74% / 16.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
3.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
3.5x
Headroom (turns)
54%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 54% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 3.0x, adding 5.4 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$579K$579K2.9%
Year 1$596K+$696K$1.3M6.5%
Year 2$614K+$1.0M$1.7M8.4%
Year 3$633K+$1.0M$1.7M8.4%
Year 4$652K+$1.0M$1.7M8.5%
Year 5$671K+$1.0M$1.7M8.6%
$5.8M
Entry EV (10x)
$18.9M
Exit EV (11x)
$13.1M
Value Created
$1.7M
Exit EBITDA
$922K
Organic Growth
$10.4M
RCM Value Creation
$1.7M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$198K$298K$397K$476K
Denial Rate Reductio$196K$295K$393K$471K
A/R Days Reduction$121K$181K$241K$290K
Clean Claim Rate$6K$10K$13K$15K
Total$522K$783K$1.0M$1.3M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 68 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin2.9%-25.5%-14.4%-3.5%
P88
Net-to-Gross12.2%28.2%42.2%56.6%
P6
Occupancy86.1%22.4%35.6%52.8%
P91
Rev/Bed$551K$447K$648K$899K
P35
Exp/Bed$535K$466K$738K$1.0M
P31

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML