Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — MERIT HEALTH WOMANS HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 03:43 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — MERIT HEALTH WOMANS HOSPITAL
CCN 250136 | MS | 34 beds | Current EBITDA $1.0M → Pro Forma $2.6M (+$1.6M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$29.6M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$1.0M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.6M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$2.6M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.1M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

64%
Realization (C)
$1.6M
Modeled Uplift
$1.0M
Risk-Adjusted
-$555K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli

Expected realization: 64% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.0M (vs $1.6M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$591K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$585K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$360K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$19K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.6M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$591K$591K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$569K$16K$585K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$91K$269K$360K$1.1M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$19K$19K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT57.4% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$148K$296K$443K$591K$591K$591K$591K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$146K$293K$439K$585K$585K$585K$585K
A/R Days Reduction$0$120K$240K$360K$360K$360K$360K$360K
Clean Claim Rate$0$9K$19K$19K$19K$19K$19K$19K
Cumulative$0$424K$847K$1.3M$1.6M$1.6M$1.6M$1.6M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.6M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x74% / 16.1x79% / 18.2x83% / 20.4x85% / 21.5x86% / 22.5x
9.0x69% / 13.9x74% / 15.8x78% / 17.8x80% / 18.7x81% / 19.7x
10.0x65% / 12.2x69% / 13.9x73% / 15.7x75% / 16.5x77% / 17.4x
11.0x61% / 10.8x65% / 12.4x69% / 13.9x71% / 14.7x73% / 15.5x
12.0x57% / 9.6x62% / 11.1x66% / 12.5x68% / 13.2x69% / 13.9x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
3.4x
Pro Forma Leverage
3.1x
Headroom (turns)
48%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 48% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 3.4x, adding 5.1 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$1.0M$1.0M3.5%
Year 1$1.1M+$1.0M$2.1M7.2%
Year 2$1.1M+$1.6M$2.7M9.0%
Year 3$1.1M+$1.6M$2.7M9.1%
Year 4$1.2M+$1.6M$2.7M9.2%
Year 5$1.2M+$1.6M$2.8M9.4%
$10.5M
Entry EV (10x)
$30.5M
Exit EV (11x)
$20.0M
Value Created
$2.8M
Exit EBITDA
$1.7M
Organic Growth
$15.6M
RCM Value Creation
$2.8M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$296K$443K$591K$710K
Denial Rate Reductio$293K$439K$585K$703K
A/R Days Reduction$180K$270K$360K$432K
Clean Claim Rate$9K$14K$19K$23K
Total$778K$1.2M$1.6M$1.9M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 69 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin3.5%-25.5%-14.0%-4.1%
P90
Net-to-Gross11.4%28.7%42.5%57.4%
P3
Occupancy35.6%21.9%35.6%52.2%
P49
Rev/Bed$870K$413K$645K$889K
P73
Exp/Bed$839K$463K$728K$1.0M
P57

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML