Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — CROSSGATES RIVER OAKS HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 03:48 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — CROSSGATES RIVER OAKS HOSPITAL
CCN 250096 | MS | 86 beds | Current EBITDA $-1.8M → Pro Forma $342K (+$2.1M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$40.4M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-1.8M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$2.1M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$342K
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.5M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

60%
Realization (C)
$2.1M
Modeled Uplift
$1.3M
Risk-Adjusted
-$842K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 60% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.3M (vs $2.1M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$807K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$799K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$491K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$26K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$2.1M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$807K$807K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$777K$22K$799K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$124K$367K$491K$1.5M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$26K$26K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT35.1% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$202K$404K$605K$807K$807K$807K$807K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$200K$399K$599K$799K$799K$799K$799K
A/R Days Reduction$0$164K$327K$491K$491K$491K$491K$491K
Clean Claim Rate$0$13K$26K$26K$26K$26K$26K$26K
Cumulative$0$578K$1.2M$1.7M$2.1M$2.1M$2.1M$2.1M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $2.1M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
-44.1x
Pro Forma Leverage
50.6x
Headroom (turns)
779%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 779% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to -44.1x, adding 143.1 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-1.8M$-1.8M-4.4%
Year 1$-1.8M+$1.4M$-420K-1.0%
Year 2$-1.9M+$2.1M$233K0.6%
Year 3$-1.9M+$2.1M$176K0.4%
Year 4$-2.0M+$2.1M$118K0.3%
Year 5$-2.1M+$2.1M$58K0.1%
$-17.8M
Entry EV (10x)
$636K
Exit EV (11x)
$18.4M
Value Created
$58K
Exit EBITDA
$-2.8M
Organic Growth
$21.2M
RCM Value Creation
$58K
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$404K$605K$807K$968K
Denial Rate Reductio$399K$599K$799K$959K
A/R Days Reduction$246K$368K$491K$589K
Clean Claim Rate$13K$19K$26K$31K
Total$1.1M$1.6M$2.1M$2.5M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 36 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-4.4%-16.5%-4.4%4.9%
P49
Net-to-Gross9.3%12.5%23.1%35.1%
P9
Occupancy18.3%26.8%41.0%55.2%
P3
Rev/Bed$469K$342K$584K$925K
P34
Exp/Bed$490K$376K$542K$1.0M
P44

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML