Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — CLAY COUNTY MEDICAL CORPORATION 2026-04-26 09:04 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — CLAY COUNTY MEDICAL CORPORATION
CCN 250067 | MS | 49 beds | Current EBITDA $214K → Pro Forma $2.6M (+$2.4M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$45.4M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$214K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$2.4M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$2.6M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.7M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

65%
Realization (C)
$2.4M
Modeled Uplift
$1.5M
Risk-Adjusted
-$843K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 65% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Commercial Payer %, Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.5M (vs $2.4M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$907K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$898K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$552K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$29K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$2.4M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$907K$907K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$873K$25K$898K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$139K$413K$552K$1.7M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$29K$29K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT52.3% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$227K$454K$681K$907K$907K$907K$907K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$225K$449K$674K$898K$898K$898K$898K
A/R Days Reduction$0$184K$368K$552K$552K$552K$552K$552K
Clean Claim Rate$0$15K$29K$29K$29K$29K$29K$29K
Cumulative$0$650K$1.3M$1.9M$2.4M$2.4M$2.4M$2.4M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $2.4M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x144% / 86.8x150% / 96.8x155% / 106.8x157% / 111.8x159% / 116.8x
9.0x138% / 76.8x144% / 85.7x148% / 94.6x151% / 99.1x153% / 103.5x
10.0x133% / 68.8x138% / 76.8x143% / 84.8x145% / 88.8x147% / 92.8x
11.0x128% / 62.3x134% / 69.5x138% / 76.8x140% / 80.5x143% / 84.1x
12.0x124% / 56.8x129% / 63.5x134% / 70.2x136% / 73.5x138% / 76.8x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
0.7x
Pro Forma Leverage
5.8x
Headroom (turns)
89%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 89% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 0.7x, adding 7.8 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$214K$214K0.5%
Year 1$220K+$1.6M$1.8M4.0%
Year 2$227K+$2.4M$2.6M5.8%
Year 3$234K+$2.4M$2.6M5.8%
Year 4$241K+$2.4M$2.6M5.8%
Year 5$248K+$2.4M$2.6M5.8%
$2.1M
Entry EV (10x)
$29.0M
Exit EV (11x)
$26.8M
Value Created
$2.6M
Exit EBITDA
$341K
Organic Growth
$23.9M
RCM Value Creation
$2.6M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$454K$681K$907K$1.1M
Denial Rate Reductio$449K$674K$898K$1.1M
A/R Days Reduction$276K$414K$552K$662K
Clean Claim Rate$15K$22K$29K$35K
Total$1.2M$1.8M$2.4M$2.9M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 63 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin0.5%-22.3%-11.9%0.6%
P73
Net-to-Gross22.2%23.8%39.2%52.3%
P23
Occupancy32.8%25.1%38.4%50.9%
P35
Rev/Bed$926K$485K$648K$899K
P77
Exp/Bed$922K$455K$728K$1.0M
P68

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML