Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — KINGS DAUGHTERS MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 03:42 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — KINGS DAUGHTERS MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 250057 | MS | 22 beds | Current EBITDA $-7.7M → Pro Forma $-2.9M (+$4.8M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$91.5M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-7.7M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$4.8M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-2.9M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$3.5M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

79%
Realization (B)
$4.8M
Modeled Uplift
$3.8M
Risk-Adjusted
-$1.0M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 79% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $3.8M (vs $4.8M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$1.8M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$1.8M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$1.1M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$59K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$4.8M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$1.8M$1.8M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$1.8M$50K$1.8M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$281K$833K$1.1M$3.5M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$59K$59K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT59.3% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$458K$915K$1.4M$1.8M$1.8M$1.8M$1.8M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$453K$906K$1.4M$1.8M$1.8M$1.8M$1.8M
A/R Days Reduction$0$371K$743K$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M
Clean Claim Rate$0$29K$59K$59K$59K$59K$59K$59K
Cumulative$0$1.3M$2.6M$3.9M$4.8M$4.8M$4.8M$4.8M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $4.8M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0x-100% / 0.0xLossLossLossLoss
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0xLossLossLoss
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0xLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-7.7M$-7.7M-8.4%
Year 1$-7.9M+$3.2M$-4.7M-5.1%
Year 2$-8.2M+$4.8M$-3.3M-3.6%
Year 3$-8.4M+$4.8M$-3.6M-3.9%
Year 4$-8.7M+$4.8M$-3.8M-4.2%
Year 5$-8.9M+$4.8M$-4.1M-4.5%
$-76.9M
Entry EV (10x)
$-45.0M
Exit EV (11x)
$31.8M
Value Created
$-4.1M
Exit EBITDA
$-12.2M
Organic Growth
$48.2M
RCM Value Creation
$-4.1M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$915K$1.4M$1.8M$2.2M
Denial Rate Reductio$906K$1.4M$1.8M$2.2M
A/R Days Reduction$557K$835K$1.1M$1.3M
Clean Claim Rate$29K$44K$59K$70K
Total$2.4M$3.6M$4.8M$5.8M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 60 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-8.4%-22.6%-14.9%-6.5%
P66
Net-to-Gross32.7%32.7%49.5%59.3%
P24
Occupancy84.9%21.3%35.6%50.3%
P93
Rev/Bed$4.2M$491K$701K$1.0M
P98
Exp/Bed$4.5M$534K$825K$1.1M
P98

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML