Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — SANFORD THIEF RIVER FALLS 2026-04-26 14:09 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — SANFORD THIEF RIVER FALLS
CCN 241381 | MN | 25 beds | Current EBITDA $5.8M → Pro Forma $9.6M (+$3.9M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$74.0M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$5.8M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$3.9M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$9.6M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$2.8M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

67%
Realization (C)
$3.9M
Modeled Uplift
$2.6M
Risk-Adjusted
-$1.3M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 67% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Revenue per Bed, Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $2.6M (vs $3.9M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$1.5M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$1.5M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$900K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$47K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$3.9M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$1.5M$1.5M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$1.4M$41K$1.5M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$227K$673K$900K$2.8M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$47K$47K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT62.3% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$370K$740K$1.1M$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$366K$732K$1.1M$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M
A/R Days Reduction$0$300K$600K$900K$900K$900K$900K$900K
Clean Claim Rate$0$24K$47K$47K$47K$47K$47K$47K
Cumulative$0$1.1M$2.1M$3.2M$3.9M$3.9M$3.9M$3.9M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $3.9M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x59% / 10.2x63% / 11.7x67% / 13.2x69% / 13.9x71% / 14.7x
9.0x54% / 8.7x59% / 10.0x63% / 11.3x64% / 12.0x66% / 12.7x
10.0x50% / 7.5x54% / 8.7x58% / 9.9x60% / 10.5x62% / 11.1x
11.0x45% / 6.5x50% / 7.6x54% / 8.7x56% / 9.2x58% / 9.8x
12.0x42% / 5.7x46% / 6.7x50% / 7.7x52% / 8.2x54% / 8.7x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
1.5x
Headroom (turns)
22%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 22% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.0x, adding 3.4 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$5.8M$5.8M7.8%
Year 1$5.9M+$2.6M$8.5M11.5%
Year 2$6.1M+$3.9M$10.0M13.5%
Year 3$6.3M+$3.9M$10.2M13.8%
Year 4$6.5M+$3.9M$10.4M14.0%
Year 5$6.7M+$3.9M$10.6M14.3%
$57.5M
Entry EV (10x)
$116.1M
Exit EV (11x)
$58.6M
Value Created
$10.6M
Exit EBITDA
$9.2M
Organic Growth
$38.9M
RCM Value Creation
$10.6M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$740K$1.1M$1.5M$1.8M
Denial Rate Reductio$732K$1.1M$1.5M$1.8M
A/R Days Reduction$450K$675K$900K$1.1M
Clean Claim Rate$24K$36K$47K$57K
Total$1.9M$2.9M$3.9M$4.7M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 93 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin7.8%-9.5%-2.4%3.4%
P86
Net-to-Gross55.6%47.6%56.3%62.3%
P45
Occupancy41.6%16.5%33.7%44.8%
P70
Rev/Bed$3.0M$1.1M$1.9M$2.7M
P80
Exp/Bed$2.7M$1.1M$1.8M$2.8M
P71

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML