Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — HENDRICKS COMMUNITY HOSPITAL ASSOC 2026-04-26 14:13 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — HENDRICKS COMMUNITY HOSPITAL ASSOC
CCN 241339 | MN | 24 beds | Current EBITDA $-491K → Pro Forma $330K (+$821K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$15.6M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-491K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$821K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$330K
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$599K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

58%
Realization (C)
$821K
Modeled Uplift
$480K
Risk-Adjusted
-$341K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli

Expected realization: 58% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Commercial Payer %, Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.5M (vs $0.8M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$312K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$309K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$190K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$821K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$312K$312K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$300K$9K$309K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$48K$142K$190K$599K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT62.8% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$78K$156K$234K$312K$312K$312K$312K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$77K$155K$232K$309K$309K$309K$309K
A/R Days Reduction$0$63K$127K$190K$190K$190K$190K$190K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$224K$447K$666K$821K$821K$821K$821K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $821K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
-12.6x
Pro Forma Leverage
19.1x
Headroom (turns)
294%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 294% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to -12.6x, adding 111.6 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-491K$-491K-3.1%
Year 1$-506K+$547K$42K0.3%
Year 2$-521K+$821K$300K1.9%
Year 3$-536K+$821K$285K1.8%
Year 4$-553K+$821K$269K1.7%
Year 5$-569K+$821K$252K1.6%
$-4.9M
Entry EV (10x)
$2.8M
Exit EV (11x)
$7.7M
Value Created
$252K
Exit EBITDA
$-782K
Organic Growth
$8.2M
RCM Value Creation
$252K
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$156K$234K$312K$375K
Denial Rate Reductio$155K$232K$309K$371K
A/R Days Reduction$95K$142K$190K$228K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$411K$616K$821K$985K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 94 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-3.1%-11.9%-2.9%3.3%
P48
Net-to-Gross70.5%49.1%56.6%62.8%
P86
Occupancy9.3%16.1%32.9%44.5%
P8
Rev/Bed$650K$1.1M$1.9M$2.7M
P8
Exp/Bed$671K$1.1M$1.8M$2.8M
P14

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML