Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — VIBRA HOSPITAL SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN 2026-04-26 15:48 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — VIBRA HOSPITAL SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN
CCN 232019 | MI | 68 beds | Current EBITDA $-5.2M → Pro Forma $-3.4M (+$1.9M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$35.6M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-5.2M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.9M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-3.4M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.4M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

71%
Realization (B)
$1.9M
Modeled Uplift
$1.3M
Risk-Adjusted
-$539K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 71% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risks: Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.3M (vs $1.9M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$713K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$706K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$434K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$23K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.9M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$713K$713K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$686K$20K$706K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$109K$324K$434K$1.4M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$23K$23K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT39.5% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$178K$356K$535K$713K$713K$713K$713K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$176K$353K$529K$706K$706K$706K$706K
A/R Days Reduction$0$145K$289K$434K$434K$434K$434K$434K
Clean Claim Rate$0$11K$23K$23K$23K$23K$23K$23K
Cumulative$0$511K$1.0M$1.5M$1.9M$1.9M$1.9M$1.9M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.9M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-5.2M$-5.2M-14.7%
Year 1$-5.4M+$1.3M$-4.1M-11.6%
Year 2$-5.5M+$1.9M$-3.7M-10.3%
Year 3$-5.7M+$1.9M$-3.8M-10.8%
Year 4$-5.9M+$1.9M$-4.0M-11.2%
Year 5$-6.1M+$1.9M$-4.2M-11.7%
$-52.3M
Entry EV (10x)
$-46.0M
Exit EV (11x)
$6.2M
Value Created
$-4.2M
Exit EBITDA
$-8.3M
Organic Growth
$18.8M
RCM Value Creation
$-4.2M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$356K$535K$713K$855K
Denial Rate Reductio$353K$529K$706K$847K
A/R Days Reduction$217K$325K$434K$520K
Clean Claim Rate$11K$17K$23K$27K
Total$938K$1.4M$1.9M$2.3M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 54 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-14.7%-13.4%-4.7%5.3%
P23
Net-to-Gross9.1%27.2%33.5%39.5%
P0
Occupancy69.8%22.7%45.0%69.7%
P74
Rev/Bed$524K$512K$1.2M$2.0M
P28
Exp/Bed$601K$534K$1.3M$2.2M
P30

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML