Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — EATON RAPIDS MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 21:27 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — EATON RAPIDS MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 231324 | MI | 20 beds | Current EBITDA $-1.4M → Pro Forma $426K (+$1.8M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$34.8M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-1.4M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.8M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$426K
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.3M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

61%
Realization (C)
$1.8M
Modeled Uplift
$1.1M
Risk-Adjusted
-$717K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 61% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.1M (vs $1.8M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$695K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$688K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$423K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$22K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.8M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$695K$695K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$669K$19K$688K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$107K$316K$423K$1.3M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$22K$22K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT54.1% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$174K$348K$521K$695K$695K$695K$695K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$172K$344K$516K$688K$688K$688K$688K
A/R Days Reduction$0$141K$282K$423K$423K$423K$423K$423K
Clean Claim Rate$0$11K$22K$22K$22K$22K$22K$22K
Cumulative$0$498K$996K$1.5M$1.8M$1.8M$1.8M$1.8M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.8M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
-27.8x
Pro Forma Leverage
34.3x
Headroom (turns)
528%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 528% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to -27.8x, adding 126.8 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-1.4M$-1.4M-4.0%
Year 1$-1.4M+$1.2M$-225K-0.6%
Year 2$-1.5M+$1.8M$341K1.0%
Year 3$-1.5M+$1.8M$296K0.9%
Year 4$-1.6M+$1.8M$250K0.7%
Year 5$-1.6M+$1.8M$203K0.6%
$-14.0M
Entry EV (10x)
$2.2M
Exit EV (11x)
$16.3M
Value Created
$203K
Exit EBITDA
$-2.2M
Organic Growth
$18.3M
RCM Value Creation
$203K
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$348K$521K$695K$834K
Denial Rate Reductio$344K$516K$688K$826K
A/R Days Reduction$211K$317K$423K$507K
Clean Claim Rate$11K$17K$22K$27K
Total$914K$1.4M$1.8M$2.2M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 53 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-4.0%-11.1%-1.3%9.2%
P44
Net-to-Gross60.5%34.3%42.9%54.1%
P88
Occupancy19.4%12.4%28.0%47.3%
P35
Rev/Bed$1.7M$657K$1.4M$2.3M
P58
Exp/Bed$1.8M$712K$1.5M$2.3M
P64

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML