Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — BARAGA COUNTY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 17:42 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — BARAGA COUNTY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL
CCN 231307 | MI | 24 beds | Current EBITDA $-2.6M → Pro Forma $-1.3M (+$1.3M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$24.3M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-2.6M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.3M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-1.3M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$934K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

62%
Realization (C)
$1.3M
Modeled Uplift
$797K
Risk-Adjusted
-$483K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 62% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.8M (vs $1.3M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$487K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$482K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$296K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$16K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.3M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$487K$487K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$469K$13K$482K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$75K$222K$296K$934K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$16K$16K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT50.7% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$122K$243K$365K$487K$487K$487K$487K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$120K$241K$361K$482K$482K$482K$482K
A/R Days Reduction$0$99K$197K$296K$296K$296K$296K$296K
Clean Claim Rate$0$8K$16K$16K$16K$16K$16K$16K
Cumulative$0$349K$697K$1.0M$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.3M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0x-100% / 0.0xLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-2.6M$-2.6M-10.5%
Year 1$-2.6M+$854K$-1.8M-7.3%
Year 2$-2.7M+$1.3M$-1.4M-5.9%
Year 3$-2.8M+$1.3M$-1.5M-6.2%
Year 4$-2.9M+$1.3M$-1.6M-6.6%
Year 5$-3.0M+$1.3M$-1.7M-6.9%
$-25.6M
Entry EV (10x)
$-18.6M
Exit EV (11x)
$7.0M
Value Created
$-1.7M
Exit EBITDA
$-4.1M
Organic Growth
$12.8M
RCM Value Creation
$-1.7M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$243K$365K$487K$584K
Denial Rate Reductio$241K$361K$482K$578K
A/R Days Reduction$148K$222K$296K$355K
Clean Claim Rate$8K$12K$16K$19K
Total$640K$960K$1.3M$1.5M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 68 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-10.5%-11.2%-3.3%8.8%
P27
Net-to-Gross59.7%33.5%41.7%50.7%
P88
Occupancy28.2%13.7%27.8%49.7%
P51
Rev/Bed$1.0M$652K$1.4M$2.3M
P36
Exp/Bed$1.1M$689K$1.5M$2.3M
P38

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML