Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — HURON VALLEY-SINAI HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 08:03 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — HURON VALLEY-SINAI HOSPITAL
CCN 230277 | MI | 145 beds | Current EBITDA $201K → Pro Forma $9.6M (+$9.4M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$178.4M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$201K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$9.4M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$9.6M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$6.8M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

68%
Realization (C)
$9.4M
Modeled Uplift
$6.4M
Risk-Adjusted
-$3.0M
Execution Discount
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Occupancy RateOccupancy Rate has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 68% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risk-adjusted uplift: $6.4M (vs $9.4M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$3.6M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$3.5M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$2.2M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$114K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$9.4M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$3.6M$3.6M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$3.4M$98K$3.5M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$548K$1.6M$2.2M$6.8M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$114K$114K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT37.6% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$892K$1.8M$2.7M$3.6M$3.6M$3.6M$3.6M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$883K$1.8M$2.6M$3.5M$3.5M$3.5M$3.5M
A/R Days Reduction$0$724K$1.4M$2.2M$2.2M$2.2M$2.2M$2.2M
Clean Claim Rate$0$57K$114K$114K$114K$114K$114K$114K
Cumulative$0$2.6M$5.1M$7.6M$9.4M$9.4M$9.4M$9.4M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $9.4M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x222% / 346.1x229% / 384.9x235% / 423.7x238% / 443.1x241% / 462.5x
9.0x214% / 307.3x221% / 341.8x227% / 376.3x230% / 393.5x233% / 410.8x
10.0x208% / 276.2x214% / 307.3x221% / 338.3x223% / 353.9x226% / 369.4x
11.0x202% / 250.8x208% / 279.0x214% / 307.3x217% / 321.4x220% / 335.5x
12.0x197% / 229.6x203% / 255.5x209% / 281.4x212% / 294.3x214% / 307.3x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
0.2x
Pro Forma Leverage
6.3x
Headroom (turns)
97%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 97% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 0.2x, adding 8.3 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$201K$201K0.1%
Year 1$207K+$6.3M$6.5M3.6%
Year 2$214K+$9.4M$9.6M5.4%
Year 3$220K+$9.4M$9.6M5.4%
Year 4$227K+$9.4M$9.6M5.4%
Year 5$233K+$9.4M$9.6M5.4%
$2.0M
Entry EV (10x)
$105.8M
Exit EV (11x)
$103.8M
Value Created
$9.6M
Exit EBITDA
$321K
Organic Growth
$93.9M
RCM Value Creation
$9.6M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$1.8M$2.7M$3.6M$4.3M
Denial Rate Reductio$1.8M$2.6M$3.5M$4.2M
A/R Days Reduction$1.1M$1.6M$2.2M$2.6M
Clean Claim Rate$57K$86K$114K$137K
Total$4.7M$7.0M$9.4M$11.3M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 56 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin0.1%-13.5%-6.7%-0.2%
P76
Net-to-Gross16.5%24.9%30.2%37.6%
P2
Occupancy54.1%53.1%65.9%79.8%
P25
Rev/Bed$1.2M$929K$1.4M$1.9M
P42
Exp/Bed$1.2M$855K$1.4M$2.1M
P41

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML