Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ST. MARYS OF MICHIGAN 2026-04-26 03:54 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ST. MARYS OF MICHIGAN
CCN 230077 | MI | 166 beds | Current EBITDA $-84.6M → Pro Forma $-70.7M (+$13.9M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$264.2M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-84.6M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$13.9M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-70.7M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$10.1M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

70%
Realization (B)
$13.9M
Modeled Uplift
$9.7M
Risk-Adjusted
-$4.2M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 70% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $9.7M (vs $13.9M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$5.3M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$5.2M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$3.2M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$169K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$13.9M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$5.3M$5.3M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$5.1M$145K$5.2M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$811K$2.4M$3.2M$10.1M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$169K$169K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT37.7% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.3M$2.6M$4.0M$5.3M$5.3M$5.3M$5.3M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.3M$2.6M$3.9M$5.2M$5.2M$5.2M$5.2M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.1M$2.1M$3.2M$3.2M$3.2M$3.2M$3.2M
Clean Claim Rate$0$85K$169K$169K$169K$169K$169K$169K
Cumulative$0$3.8M$7.6M$11.3M$13.9M$13.9M$13.9M$13.9M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $13.9M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-84.6M$-84.6M-32.0%
Year 1$-87.1M+$9.3M$-77.8M-29.5%
Year 2$-89.7M+$13.9M$-75.8M-28.7%
Year 3$-92.4M+$13.9M$-78.5M-29.7%
Year 4$-95.2M+$13.9M$-81.3M-30.8%
Year 5$-98.0M+$13.9M$-84.1M-31.8%
$-845.5M
Entry EV (10x)
$-925.3M
Exit EV (11x)
$-79.8M
Value Created
$-84.1M
Exit EBITDA
$-134.7M
Organic Growth
$139.0M
RCM Value Creation
$-84.1M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$2.6M$4.0M$5.3M$6.3M
Denial Rate Reductio$2.6M$3.9M$5.2M$6.3M
A/R Days Reduction$1.6M$2.4M$3.2M$3.9M
Clean Claim Rate$85K$127K$169K$203K
Total$7.0M$10.4M$13.9M$16.7M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 55 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-32.0%-13.4%-6.8%-0.2%
P9
Net-to-Gross26.8%24.3%30.7%37.7%
P28
Occupancy64.7%54.7%66.9%81.2%
P44
Rev/Bed$1.6M$928K$1.4M$1.9M
P56
Exp/Bed$2.1M$844K$1.4M$2.1M
P75

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML