Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — FAIRVIEW HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 11:54 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — FAIRVIEW HOSPITAL
CCN 221302 | MA | 24 beds | Current EBITDA $18.7M → Pro Forma $25.7M (+$7.0M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$94.5M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$18.7M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$7.0M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$25.7M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+736bps
Margin Improvement
$3.6M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

70%
Realization (C)
$7.0M
Modeled Uplift
$4.8M
Risk-Adjusted
-$2.1M
Execution Discount
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli

Expected realization: 70% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Revenue per Bed, Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risk-adjusted uplift: $4.8M (vs $7.0M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Net Collection Rate
Revenue | 18mo ramp
$2.0M
+210bp
Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$1.9M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$1.9M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$1.2M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$60K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$7.0M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT97.0% BENCHMARK$2.0M$0$2.0M$018mo
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$1.9M$1.9M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$1.8M$52K$1.9M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$290K$860K$1.2M$3.6M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$60K$60K$06mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Net Collection Rate$0$331K$662K$993K$1.3M$2.0M$2.0M$2.0M
Cost to Collect$0$473K$945K$1.4M$1.9M$1.9M$1.9M$1.9M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$468K$936K$1.4M$1.9M$1.9M$1.9M$1.9M
A/R Days Reduction$0$383K$767K$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M
Clean Claim Rate$0$30K$60K$60K$60K$60K$60K$60K
Cumulative$0$1.7M$3.4M$5.0M$6.3M$7.0M$7.0M$7.0M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $7.0M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x51% / 8.0x56% / 9.2x60% / 10.4x62% / 11.1x63% / 11.7x
9.0x46% / 6.7x51% / 7.8x55% / 8.9x57% / 9.5x59% / 10.0x
10.0x42% / 5.7x46% / 6.7x50% / 7.7x52% / 8.2x54% / 8.7x
11.0x37% / 4.9x42% / 5.8x46% / 6.7x48% / 7.2x50% / 7.6x
12.0x33% / 4.2x38% / 5.0x42% / 5.9x44% / 6.3x46% / 6.7x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.2x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.3x
Headroom (turns)
5%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 5% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.2x, adding 2.3 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$18.7M$18.7M19.8%
Year 1$19.3M+$4.6M$23.9M25.3%
Year 2$19.9M+$7.0M$26.8M28.4%
Year 3$20.5M+$7.0M$27.4M29.0%
Year 4$21.1M+$7.0M$28.0M29.6%
Year 5$21.7M+$7.0M$28.7M30.3%
$187.2M
Entry EV (10x)
$315.2M
Exit EV (11x)
$128.0M
Value Created
$28.7M
Exit EBITDA
$29.8M
Organic Growth
$69.6M
RCM Value Creation
$28.7M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Net Collection Rate$993K$1.5M$2.0M$2.4M
Cost to Collect$945K$1.4M$1.9M$2.3M
Denial Rate Reductio$936K$1.4M$1.9M$2.2M
A/R Days Reduction$575K$863K$1.2M$1.4M
Clean Claim Rate$30K$45K$60K$73K
Total$3.5M$5.2M$7.0M$8.3M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 12 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin19.8%-35.1%-25.8%-5.1%
P89
Net-to-Gross60.1%36.0%53.3%60.1%
P67
Occupancy40.0%43.0%55.7%85.2%
P17
Rev/Bed$3.9M$1.4M$3.9M$4.9M
P44
Exp/Bed$3.2M$649K$2.2M$5.0M
P58

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML