Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — DANA-FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE 2026-04-26 02:16 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — DANA-FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE
CCN 220162 | MA | 30 beds | Current EBITDA $-660.4M → Pro Forma $-561.3M (+$99.1M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$1.88B
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-660.4M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$99.1M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-561.3M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$72.2M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

95%
Realization (A)
$99.1M
Modeled Uplift
$94.1M
Risk-Adjusted
-$5.0M
Execution Discount
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 95% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Revenue per Bed, Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $94.1M (vs $99.1M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$37.7M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$37.3M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$22.9M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$1.2M
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$99.1M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$37.7M$37.7M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$36.3M$1.0M$37.3M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$5.8M$17.1M$22.9M$72.2M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$1.2M$1.2M$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT60.1% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$9.4M$18.8M$28.3M$37.7M$37.7M$37.7M$37.7M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$9.3M$18.6M$28.0M$37.3M$37.3M$37.3M$37.3M
A/R Days Reduction$0$7.6M$15.3M$22.9M$22.9M$22.9M$22.9M$22.9M
Clean Claim Rate$0$603K$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M
Cumulative$0$27.0M$54.0M$80.4M$99.1M$99.1M$99.1M$99.1M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $99.1M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-660.4M$-660.4M-35.1%
Year 1$-680.2M+$66.1M$-614.2M-32.6%
Year 2$-700.7M+$99.1M$-601.6M-31.9%
Year 3$-721.7M+$99.1M$-622.6M-33.1%
Year 4$-743.3M+$99.1M$-644.2M-34.2%
Year 5$-765.6M+$99.1M$-666.5M-35.4%
$-6.60B
Entry EV (10x)
$-7.33B
Exit EV (11x)
$-727.5M
Value Created
$-666.5M
Exit EBITDA
$-1.05B
Organic Growth
$990.9M
RCM Value Creation
$-666.5M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$18.8M$28.3M$37.7M$45.2M
Denial Rate Reductio$18.6M$28.0M$37.3M$44.8M
A/R Days Reduction$11.5M$17.2M$22.9M$27.5M
Clean Claim Rate$603K$904K$1.2M$1.4M
Total$49.5M$74.3M$99.1M$118.9M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 17 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-35.1%-26.1%-5.1%3.2%
P15
Net-to-Gross34.8%37.0%44.9%60.1%
P8
Occupancy87.8%46.4%79.6%87.8%
P71
Rev/Bed$62.8M$788K$1.4M$3.9M
P92
Exp/Bed$84.8M$576K$864K$2.7M
P94

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML