Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — GOOD SAMARITAN MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 03:43 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — GOOD SAMARITAN MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 220111 | MA | 208 beds | Current EBITDA $22.2M → Pro Forma $38.0M (+$15.8M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$300.2M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$22.2M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$15.8M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$38.0M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$11.5M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

72%
Realization (B)
$15.8M
Modeled Uplift
$11.4M
Risk-Adjusted
-$4.4M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 72% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $11.4M (vs $15.8M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$6.0M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$5.9M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$3.7M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$192K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$15.8M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$6.0M$6.0M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$5.8M$165K$5.9M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$921K$2.7M$3.7M$11.5M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$192K$192K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT52.4% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.5M$3.0M$4.5M$6.0M$6.0M$6.0M$6.0M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.5M$3.0M$4.5M$5.9M$5.9M$5.9M$5.9M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.2M$2.4M$3.7M$3.7M$3.7M$3.7M$3.7M
Clean Claim Rate$0$96K$192K$192K$192K$192K$192K$192K
Cumulative$0$4.3M$8.6M$12.8M$15.8M$15.8M$15.8M$15.8M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $15.8M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x60% / 10.4x64% / 12.0x68% / 13.5x70% / 14.2x72% / 15.0x
9.0x55% / 8.9x59% / 10.3x63% / 11.6x65% / 12.3x67% / 13.0x
10.0x50% / 7.7x55% / 8.9x59% / 10.1x61% / 10.7x63% / 11.3x
11.0x46% / 6.7x51% / 7.8x55% / 8.9x57% / 9.5x59% / 10.0x
12.0x42% / 5.9x47% / 6.9x51% / 7.9x53% / 8.4x55% / 8.9x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
4.9x
Pro Forma Leverage
1.6x
Headroom (turns)
24%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 24% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 4.9x, adding 3.5 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$22.2M$22.2M7.4%
Year 1$22.9M+$10.5M$33.4M11.1%
Year 2$23.5M+$15.8M$39.3M13.1%
Year 3$24.2M+$15.8M$40.0M13.3%
Year 4$25.0M+$15.8M$40.8M13.6%
Year 5$25.7M+$15.8M$41.5M13.8%
$221.9M
Entry EV (10x)
$456.6M
Exit EV (11x)
$234.8M
Value Created
$41.5M
Exit EBITDA
$35.3M
Organic Growth
$157.9M
RCM Value Creation
$41.5M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$3.0M$4.5M$6.0M$7.2M
Denial Rate Reductio$3.0M$4.5M$5.9M$7.1M
A/R Days Reduction$1.8M$2.7M$3.7M$4.4M
Clean Claim Rate$96K$144K$192K$231K
Total$7.9M$11.8M$15.8M$19.0M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 54 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin7.4%-27.9%-10.7%-0.9%
P85
Net-to-Gross48.9%35.9%43.7%52.4%
P65
Occupancy77.7%60.3%69.5%81.8%
P65
Rev/Bed$1.4M$398K$1.4M$1.8M
P50
Exp/Bed$1.3M$357K$1.5M$2.0M
P44

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML