Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — NEW ENGLAND BAPTIST HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 03:42 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — NEW ENGLAND BAPTIST HOSPITAL
CCN 220088 | MA | 75 beds | Current EBITDA $-10.1M → Pro Forma $1.6M (+$11.6M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$221.2M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-10.1M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$11.6M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$1.6M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$8.5M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

66%
Realization (C)
$11.6M
Modeled Uplift
$7.7M
Risk-Adjusted
-$3.9M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 66% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Revenue per Bed. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $7.7M (vs $11.6M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$4.4M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$4.4M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$2.7M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$142K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$11.6M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$4.4M$4.4M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$4.3M$122K$4.4M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$679K$2.0M$2.7M$8.5M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$142K$142K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT59.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.1M$2.2M$3.3M$4.4M$4.4M$4.4M$4.4M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.1M$2.2M$3.3M$4.4M$4.4M$4.4M$4.4M
A/R Days Reduction$0$897K$1.8M$2.7M$2.7M$2.7M$2.7M$2.7M
Clean Claim Rate$0$71K$142K$142K$142K$142K$142K$142K
Cumulative$0$3.2M$6.3M$9.4M$11.6M$11.6M$11.6M$11.6M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $11.6M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
-55.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
61.5x
Headroom (turns)
945%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 945% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to -55.0x, adding 154.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-10.1M$-10.1M-4.6%
Year 1$-10.4M+$7.8M$-2.6M-1.2%
Year 2$-10.7M+$11.6M$939K0.4%
Year 3$-11.0M+$11.6M$618K0.3%
Year 4$-11.4M+$11.6M$287K0.1%
Year 5$-11.7M+$11.6M$-53K-0.0%
$-100.9M
Entry EV (10x)
$-588K
Exit EV (11x)
$100.3M
Value Created
$-53K
Exit EBITDA
$-16.1M
Organic Growth
$116.4M
RCM Value Creation
$-53K
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$2.2M$3.3M$4.4M$5.3M
Denial Rate Reductio$2.2M$3.3M$4.4M$5.3M
A/R Days Reduction$1.3M$2.0M$2.7M$3.2M
Clean Claim Rate$71K$106K$142K$170K
Total$5.8M$8.7M$11.6M$14.0M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 49 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-4.6%-16.9%-10.7%1.5%
P59
Net-to-Gross56.6%35.8%44.1%59.0%
P72
Occupancy35.8%59.3%70.0%85.4%
P6
Rev/Bed$2.9M$363K$1.1M$1.7M
P96
Exp/Bed$3.1M$338K$1.2M$1.8M
P94

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML