Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — STEWARD ST. ELIZABETHS MEDICAL CTR 2026-04-26 03:41 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — STEWARD ST. ELIZABETHS MEDICAL CTR
CCN 220036 | MA | 244 beds | Current EBITDA $2.9M → Pro Forma $25.5M (+$22.5M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$428.5M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$2.9M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$22.5M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$25.5M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$16.4M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

70%
Realization (C)
$22.5M
Modeled Uplift
$15.8M
Risk-Adjusted
-$6.8M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 70% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $15.8M (vs $22.5M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$8.6M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$8.5M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$5.2M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$274K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$22.5M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$8.6M$8.6M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$8.2M$236K$8.5M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.3M$3.9M$5.2M$16.4M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$274K$274K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT49.6% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$2.1M$4.3M$6.4M$8.6M$8.6M$8.6M$8.6M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$2.1M$4.2M$6.4M$8.5M$8.5M$8.5M$8.5M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.7M$3.5M$5.2M$5.2M$5.2M$5.2M$5.2M
Clean Claim Rate$0$137K$274K$274K$274K$274K$274K$274K
Cumulative$0$6.1M$12.3M$18.3M$22.5M$22.5M$22.5M$22.5M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $22.5M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x128% / 61.4x133% / 68.5x138% / 75.7x140% / 79.3x142% / 82.9x
9.0x122% / 54.2x127% / 60.5x132% / 66.9x134% / 70.1x136% / 73.3x
10.0x117% / 48.4x122% / 54.2x127% / 59.9x129% / 62.8x131% / 65.7x
11.0x113% / 43.7x118% / 49.0x122% / 54.2x124% / 56.8x126% / 59.4x
12.0x109% / 39.8x114% / 44.6x118% / 49.4x120% / 51.8x122% / 54.2x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
1.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
5.5x
Headroom (turns)
85%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 85% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 1.0x, adding 7.5 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$2.9M$2.9M0.7%
Year 1$3.0M+$15.0M$18.1M4.2%
Year 2$3.1M+$22.5M$25.7M6.0%
Year 3$3.2M+$22.5M$25.8M6.0%
Year 4$3.3M+$22.5M$25.8M6.0%
Year 5$3.4M+$22.5M$25.9M6.1%
$29.4M
Entry EV (10x)
$285.4M
Exit EV (11x)
$256.1M
Value Created
$25.9M
Exit EBITDA
$4.7M
Organic Growth
$225.4M
RCM Value Creation
$25.9M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$4.3M$6.4M$8.6M$10.3M
Denial Rate Reductio$4.2M$6.4M$8.5M$10.2M
A/R Days Reduction$2.6M$3.9M$5.2M$6.3M
Clean Claim Rate$137K$206K$274K$329K
Total$11.3M$16.9M$22.5M$27.1M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 43 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin0.7%-29.1%-11.3%-1.6%
P80
Net-to-Gross53.0%34.6%42.9%49.6%
P83
Occupancy69.0%61.1%71.9%83.9%
P37
Rev/Bed$1.8M$1.1M$1.7M$1.9M
P59
Exp/Bed$1.7M$1.1M$1.7M$2.1M
P49

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML