Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — BROOK LANE PSYCHIATRIC CENTER 2026-04-26 06:38 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — BROOK LANE PSYCHIATRIC CENTER
CCN 214003 | MD | 65 beds | Current EBITDA $97K → Pro Forma $1.5M (+$1.4M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$26.6M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$97K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.4M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$1.5M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.0M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

70%
Realization (B)
$1.4M
Modeled Uplift
$985K
Risk-Adjusted
-$413K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 70% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Commercial Payer %. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.0M (vs $1.4M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$531K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$526K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$323K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$17K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.4M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$531K$531K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$511K$15K$526K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$82K$242K$323K$1.0M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$17K$17K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT85.9% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$133K$266K$399K$531K$531K$531K$531K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$132K$263K$395K$526K$526K$526K$526K
A/R Days Reduction$0$108K$216K$323K$323K$323K$323K$323K
Clean Claim Rate$0$9K$17K$17K$17K$17K$17K$17K
Cumulative$0$381K$761K$1.1M$1.4M$1.4M$1.4M$1.4M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.4M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x156% / 110.3x162% / 122.9x167% / 135.5x169% / 141.8x172% / 148.1x
9.0x150% / 97.7x155% / 108.9x161% / 120.1x163% / 125.7x165% / 131.3x
10.0x145% / 87.6x150% / 97.7x155% / 107.7x157% / 112.8x160% / 117.8x
11.0x140% / 79.3x145% / 88.5x150% / 97.7x152% / 102.2x155% / 106.8x
12.0x135% / 72.4x141% / 80.8x146% / 89.2x148% / 93.4x150% / 97.7x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
0.6x
Pro Forma Leverage
5.9x
Headroom (turns)
92%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 92% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 0.6x, adding 7.9 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$97K$97K0.4%
Year 1$100K+$932K$1.0M3.9%
Year 2$103K+$1.4M$1.5M5.6%
Year 3$106K+$1.4M$1.5M5.7%
Year 4$110K+$1.4M$1.5M5.7%
Year 5$113K+$1.4M$1.5M5.7%
$973K
Entry EV (10x)
$16.6M
Exit EV (11x)
$15.6M
Value Created
$1.5M
Exit EBITDA
$155K
Organic Growth
$14.0M
RCM Value Creation
$1.5M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$266K$399K$531K$638K
Denial Rate Reductio$263K$395K$526K$631K
A/R Days Reduction$162K$242K$323K$388K
Clean Claim Rate$9K$13K$17K$20K
Total$699K$1.0M$1.4M$1.7M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 18 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin0.4%-13.6%-3.4%2.3%
P64
Net-to-Gross83.2%71.5%83.0%85.9%
P50
Occupancy74.6%68.1%73.5%85.8%
P53
Rev/Bed$409K$701K$1.5M$1.9M
P7
Exp/Bed$407K$404K$941K$2.0M
P28

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML