Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — LEVINDAL HEBREW GER. CTR. & HOSPT. 2026-04-26 14:08 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — LEVINDAL HEBREW GER. CTR. & HOSPT.
CCN 210064 | MD | 120 beds | Current EBITDA $5.2M → Pro Forma $9.8M (+$4.6M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$88.4M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$5.2M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$4.6M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$9.8M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$3.4M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

70%
Realization (B)
$4.6M
Modeled Uplift
$3.3M
Risk-Adjusted
-$1.4M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 70% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Commercial Payer %. Risks: Net-to-Gross Ratio, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $3.3M (vs $4.6M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$1.8M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$1.7M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$1.1M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$57K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$4.6M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$1.8M$1.8M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$1.7M$49K$1.7M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$271K$804K$1.1M$3.4M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$57K$57K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT85.5% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$442K$884K$1.3M$1.8M$1.8M$1.8M$1.8M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$437K$875K$1.3M$1.7M$1.7M$1.7M$1.7M
A/R Days Reduction$0$358K$717K$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M
Clean Claim Rate$0$28K$57K$57K$57K$57K$57K$57K
Cumulative$0$1.3M$2.5M$3.8M$4.6M$4.6M$4.6M$4.6M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $4.6M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x64% / 11.8x68% / 13.4x72% / 15.1x74% / 16.0x76% / 16.8x
9.0x59% / 10.1x63% / 11.6x67% / 13.1x69% / 13.8x71% / 14.6x
10.0x54% / 8.8x59% / 10.1x63% / 11.4x65% / 12.1x66% / 12.8x
11.0x50% / 7.7x55% / 8.9x59% / 10.1x61% / 10.7x62% / 11.3x
12.0x47% / 6.8x51% / 7.9x55% / 9.0x57% / 9.6x59% / 10.1x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
4.5x
Pro Forma Leverage
2.0x
Headroom (turns)
31%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 31% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 4.5x, adding 4.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$5.2M$5.2M5.9%
Year 1$5.3M+$3.1M$8.4M9.6%
Year 2$5.5M+$4.6M$10.2M11.5%
Year 3$5.7M+$4.6M$10.3M11.7%
Year 4$5.8M+$4.6M$10.5M11.9%
Year 5$6.0M+$4.6M$10.7M12.1%
$51.9M
Entry EV (10x)
$117.3M
Exit EV (11x)
$65.4M
Value Created
$10.7M
Exit EBITDA
$8.3M
Organic Growth
$46.5M
RCM Value Creation
$10.7M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$884K$1.3M$1.8M$2.1M
Denial Rate Reductio$875K$1.3M$1.7M$2.1M
A/R Days Reduction$538K$807K$1.1M$1.3M
Clean Claim Rate$28K$42K$57K$68K
Total$2.3M$3.5M$4.6M$5.6M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 37 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin5.9%-12.2%-7.9%-1.5%
P94
Net-to-Gross86.3%77.1%83.9%85.5%
P85
Occupancy69.3%67.2%74.8%80.3%
P28
Rev/Bed$736K$1.2M$1.5M$1.8M
P12
Exp/Bed$693K$896K$1.5M$2.1M
P22

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML