Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — CHESTER RIVER HOSPITAL CENTER 2026-04-26 14:07 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — CHESTER RIVER HOSPITAL CENTER
CCN 210030 | MD | 12 beds | Current EBITDA $733K → Pro Forma $3.2M (+$2.5M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$46.6M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$733K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$2.5M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$3.2M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.8M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

67%
Realization (C)
$2.5M
Modeled Uplift
$1.6M
Risk-Adjusted
-$808K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood

Expected realization: 67% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Revenue per Bed, Commercial Payer %. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.6M (vs $2.5M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$932K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$923K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$567K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$30K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$2.5M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$932K$932K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$897K$26K$923K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$143K$424K$567K$1.8M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$30K$30K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT68.2% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$233K$466K$699K$932K$932K$932K$932K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$231K$461K$692K$923K$923K$923K$923K
A/R Days Reduction$0$189K$378K$567K$567K$567K$567K$567K
Clean Claim Rate$0$15K$30K$30K$30K$30K$30K$30K
Cumulative$0$668K$1.3M$2.0M$2.5M$2.5M$2.5M$2.5M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $2.5M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x97% / 29.7x102% / 33.3x106% / 37.0x108% / 38.8x110% / 40.6x
9.0x92% / 26.0x96% / 29.3x101% / 32.5x103% / 34.1x104% / 35.8x
10.0x87% / 23.1x92% / 26.0x96% / 28.9x98% / 30.4x100% / 31.9x
11.0x83% / 20.7x88% / 23.4x92% / 26.0x94% / 27.3x96% / 28.7x
12.0x80% / 18.7x84% / 21.1x88% / 23.6x90% / 24.8x92% / 26.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
1.9x
Pro Forma Leverage
4.6x
Headroom (turns)
70%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 70% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 1.9x, adding 6.5 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$733K$733K1.6%
Year 1$755K+$1.6M$2.4M5.1%
Year 2$778K+$2.5M$3.2M6.9%
Year 3$801K+$2.5M$3.3M7.0%
Year 4$825K+$2.5M$3.3M7.0%
Year 5$850K+$2.5M$3.3M7.1%
$7.3M
Entry EV (10x)
$36.3M
Exit EV (11x)
$29.0M
Value Created
$3.3M
Exit EBITDA
$1.2M
Organic Growth
$24.5M
RCM Value Creation
$3.3M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$466K$699K$932K$1.1M
Denial Rate Reductio$461K$692K$923K$1.1M
A/R Days Reduction$284K$425K$567K$680K
Clean Claim Rate$15K$22K$30K$36K
Total$1.2M$1.8M$2.5M$2.9M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 867 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin1.6%-22.6%-8.5%2.6%
P72
Net-to-Gross80.9%37.6%54.3%68.1%
P89
Occupancy27.6%15.7%26.8%45.6%
P52
Rev/Bed$3.9M$600K$1.1M$2.0M
P92
Exp/Bed$3.8M$719K$1.3M$2.1M
P93

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML