Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — AHC WHITE OAK MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 08:03 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — AHC WHITE OAK MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 210016 | MD | 196 beds | Current EBITDA $-139.8M → Pro Forma $-122.8M (+$17.0M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$323.2M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-139.8M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$17.0M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-122.8M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$12.4M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

78%
Realization (B)
$17.0M
Modeled Uplift
$13.3M
Risk-Adjusted
-$3.7M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 78% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risk-adjusted uplift: $13.3M (vs $17.0M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$6.5M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$6.4M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$3.9M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$207K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$17.0M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$6.5M$6.5M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$6.2M$178K$6.4M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$992K$2.9M$3.9M$12.4M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$207K$207K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT85.1% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.6M$3.2M$4.8M$6.5M$6.5M$6.5M$6.5M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.6M$3.2M$4.8M$6.4M$6.4M$6.4M$6.4M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.3M$2.6M$3.9M$3.9M$3.9M$3.9M$3.9M
Clean Claim Rate$0$103K$207K$207K$207K$207K$207K$207K
Cumulative$0$4.6M$9.3M$13.8M$17.0M$17.0M$17.0M$17.0M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $17.0M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-139.8M$-139.8M-43.2%
Year 1$-144.0M+$11.3M$-132.6M-41.0%
Year 2$-148.3M+$17.0M$-131.3M-40.6%
Year 3$-152.7M+$17.0M$-135.7M-42.0%
Year 4$-157.3M+$17.0M$-140.3M-43.4%
Year 5$-162.0M+$17.0M$-145.0M-44.9%
$-1.40B
Entry EV (10x)
$-1.60B
Exit EV (11x)
$-197.6M
Value Created
$-145.0M
Exit EBITDA
$-222.6M
Organic Growth
$170.0M
RCM Value Creation
$-145.0M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$3.2M$4.8M$6.5M$7.8M
Denial Rate Reductio$3.2M$4.8M$6.4M$7.7M
A/R Days Reduction$2.0M$2.9M$3.9M$4.7M
Clean Claim Rate$103K$155K$207K$248K
Total$8.5M$12.8M$17.0M$20.4M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 33 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-43.2%-12.1%-7.0%-3.3%
P6
Net-to-Gross82.8%81.3%84.1%85.1%
P34
Occupancy112.2%69.1%74.4%78.3%
P97
Rev/Bed$1.6M$1.3M$1.5M$1.7M
P72
Exp/Bed$2.4M$1.4M$1.6M$1.9M
P91

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML