Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — SEASIDE HEALTH SYSTEM 2026-04-26 12:31 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — SEASIDE HEALTH SYSTEM
CCN 194103 | LA | 64 beds | Current EBITDA $445K → Pro Forma $1.1M (+$686K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$13.0M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$445K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$686K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$1.1M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+528bps
Margin Improvement
$498K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

65%
Realization (C)
$686K
Modeled Uplift
$447K
Risk-Adjusted
-$239K
Execution Discount
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Payer DiversityHigher Payer Diversity increases execution likelih
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Occupancy RateOccupancy Rate has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 65% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Payer Diversity, Bed Count. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.4M (vs $0.7M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$260K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$258K
+199bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$158K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+7bp
Total EBITDA Impact$686K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$260K$260K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$250K$8K$258K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$40K$118K$158K$498K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT44.4% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$65K$130K$195K$260K$260K$260K$260K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$65K$129K$194K$258K$258K$258K$258K
A/R Days Reduction$0$53K$105K$158K$158K$158K$158K$158K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$187K$374K$556K$686K$686K$686K$686K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $686K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x75% / 16.5x80% / 18.7x84% / 20.9x86% / 22.0x87% / 23.1x
9.0x70% / 14.3x75% / 16.3x79% / 18.2x81% / 19.2x82% / 20.2x
10.0x66% / 12.6x70% / 14.3x74% / 16.1x76% / 16.9x78% / 17.8x
11.0x62% / 11.1x66% / 12.7x70% / 14.3x72% / 15.1x74% / 15.9x
12.0x58% / 9.9x63% / 11.4x67% / 12.8x68% / 13.6x70% / 14.3x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
3.3x
Pro Forma Leverage
3.2x
Headroom (turns)
49%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 49% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 3.3x, adding 5.1 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$445K$445K3.4%
Year 1$458K+$457K$915K7.0%
Year 2$472K+$686K$1.2M8.9%
Year 3$486K+$686K$1.2M9.0%
Year 4$501K+$686K$1.2M9.1%
Year 5$516K+$686K$1.2M9.2%
$4.4M
Entry EV (10x)
$13.2M
Exit EV (11x)
$8.8M
Value Created
$1.2M
Exit EBITDA
$708K
Organic Growth
$6.9M
RCM Value Creation
$1.2M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$130K$195K$260K$312K
Denial Rate Reductio$129K$194K$258K$310K
A/R Days Reduction$79K$119K$158K$190K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$343K$514K$686K$823K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 77 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin3.4%-22.5%-3.1%4.2%
P71
Net-to-Gross32.4%26.4%35.5%44.4%
P42
Occupancy48.8%28.6%56.6%68.5%
P45
Rev/Bed$203K$248K$381K$672K
P10
Exp/Bed$196K$232K$421K$861K
P12

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML