Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — COBALT REHABILITATION HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 09:54 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — COBALT REHABILITATION HOSPITAL
CCN 193098 | LA | 60 beds | Current EBITDA $5.2M → Pro Forma $5.9M (+$662K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$12.5M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$5.2M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$662K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$5.9M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+528bps
Margin Improvement
$480K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

63%
Realization (C)
$662K
Modeled Uplift
$419K
Risk-Adjusted
-$243K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 63% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.4M (vs $0.7M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$250K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$249K
+199bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$152K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+8bp
Total EBITDA Impact$662K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$250K$250K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$241K$8K$249K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$38K$114K$152K$480K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT45.9% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$63K$125K$188K$250K$250K$250K$250K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$62K$125K$187K$249K$249K$249K$249K
A/R Days Reduction$0$51K$102K$152K$152K$152K$152K$152K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$180K$361K$537K$662K$662K$662K$662K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $662K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x44% / 6.2x48% / 7.2x52% / 8.2x54% / 8.8x56% / 9.3x
9.0x39% / 5.1x43% / 6.0x47% / 7.0x49% / 7.4x51% / 7.9x
10.0x34% / 4.3x39% / 5.1x43% / 6.0x45% / 6.4x47% / 6.8x
11.0x29% / 3.6x34% / 4.3x39% / 5.1x41% / 5.5x42% / 5.9x
12.0x25% / 3.0x30% / 3.7x35% / 4.4x37% / 4.8x39% / 5.1x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
7.5x
Pro Forma Leverage
-1.0x
Headroom (turns)
-16%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -16% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 7.5x, adding 1.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$5.2M$5.2M41.6%
Year 1$5.4M+$441K$5.8M46.4%
Year 2$5.5M+$662K$6.2M49.5%
Year 3$5.7M+$662K$6.4M50.8%
Year 4$5.9M+$662K$6.5M52.1%
Year 5$6.0M+$662K$6.7M53.5%
$52.1M
Entry EV (10x)
$73.7M
Exit EV (11x)
$21.6M
Value Created
$6.7M
Exit EBITDA
$8.3M
Organic Growth
$6.6M
RCM Value Creation
$6.7M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$125K$188K$250K$300K
Denial Rate Reductio$125K$187K$249K$299K
A/R Days Reduction$76K$114K$152K$183K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$331K$496K$662K$794K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 85 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin41.6%-25.1%-4.9%4.1%
P98
Net-to-Gross41.5%27.3%35.8%45.9%
P62
Occupancy37.6%28.2%54.8%68.5%
P38
Rev/Bed$209K$255K$416K$702K
P14
Exp/Bed$122K$236K$430K$885K
P2

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML