Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — REHAB HOSPITAL OF JENNINGS 2026-04-26 15:51 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — REHAB HOSPITAL OF JENNINGS
CCN 193067 | LA | 27 beds | Current EBITDA $1.5M → Pro Forma $1.9M (+$358K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$6.6M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$1.5M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$358K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$1.9M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+541bps
Margin Improvement
$254K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

66%
Realization (C)
$358K
Modeled Uplift
$237K
Risk-Adjusted
-$121K
Execution Discount
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 66% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Commercial Payer %, Bed Count. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.2M (vs $0.4M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$136K
+205bp
Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$132K
+200bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$80K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+15bp
Total EBITDA Impact$358K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$127K$8K$136K$012mo
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$132K$132K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$20K$60K$80K$254K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT58.1% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Denial Rate Reduction$0$34K$68K$102K$136K$136K$136K$136K
Cost to Collect$0$33K$66K$99K$132K$132K$132K$132K
A/R Days Reduction$0$27K$54K$80K$80K$80K$80K$80K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$99K$197K$291K$358K$358K$358K$358K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $358K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x47% / 7.0x52% / 8.1x56% / 9.2x58% / 9.8x60% / 10.4x
9.0x42% / 5.8x47% / 6.8x51% / 7.9x53% / 8.4x55% / 8.9x
10.0x38% / 4.9x42% / 5.8x46% / 6.8x48% / 7.2x50% / 7.7x
11.0x33% / 4.2x38% / 5.0x42% / 5.8x44% / 6.2x46% / 6.7x
12.0x29% / 3.6x34% / 4.3x38% / 5.1x40% / 5.5x42% / 5.8x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.8x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.3x
Headroom (turns)
-5%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -5% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.8x, adding 1.6 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$1.5M$1.5M22.7%
Year 1$1.5M+$239K$1.8M27.0%
Year 2$1.6M+$358K$1.9M29.5%
Year 3$1.6M+$358K$2.0M30.2%
Year 4$1.7M+$358K$2.0M31.0%
Year 5$1.7M+$358K$2.1M31.7%
$15.0M
Entry EV (10x)
$23.1M
Exit EV (11x)
$8.1M
Value Created
$2.1M
Exit EBITDA
$2.4M
Organic Growth
$3.6M
RCM Value Creation
$2.1M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Denial Rate Reductio$68K$102K$136K$163K
Cost to Collect$66K$99K$132K$159K
A/R Days Reduction$40K$60K$80K$97K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$179K$268K$358K$429K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 135 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin22.7%-17.2%-3.1%5.9%
P93
Net-to-Gross47.2%32.2%44.2%58.1%
P55
Occupancy44.2%21.1%46.3%68.5%
P47
Rev/Bed$245K$288K$468K$882K
P16
Exp/Bed$189K$276K$468K$963K
P6

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML