ML Analysis — REHAB HOSPITAL OF JENNINGS
CCN 193067 | Clustering + Distress + RCM Opportunity
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
Investability Score
Speculative — only pursue if turnaround thesis is strong and entry multiple reflects risk.
42
/ 100 (D)
Financial Health16/25
RCM Upside5/25
Market Position8/20
Demand Defensibility4/15
Operational Efficiency9/15
Entry Multiple: 8.0x – 10.0x
Est. MOIC: 1.9x
Risk Factors:
- Heavy Medicare dependence (>55%)
- Small facility (<50 beds) — limited scale
Catalysts:
- Limited competition supports pricing power
Margin Prediction (Trained Ridge Model)
-6.1%
R²=0.34 | n=4,907 | Grade B | Actual: 22.7%
Ridge regression trained on 4,907 HCRIS hospitals. 90% CI: [-34.4%, 22.2%]. P47 nationally.
| Driver | Value | Effect | Explanation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue/Bed | 244928.074 | -0.1863 | Lower Revenue/Bed decreases predicted margin | |
| Expense/Bed | 189348.481 | +0.1808 | Higher Expense/Bed increases predicted margin | |
| Bed Utilization Value | 108310.152 | -0.0254 | Lower Bed Utilization Value decreases predicted ma | |
| Log(Beds) | 3.296 | -0.0251 | Lower Log(Beds) decreases predicted margin | |
| Bed Count | 27.000 | +0.0190 | Higher Bed Count increases predicted margin |
nan%
Distress Risk
$8.4M
RCM Opportunity
A
Opportunity Grade
149.7%
Projected Margin
Distress Analysis
Risk: Unknown
National distress rate: 49.3%
LA distress rate: 46.3%
Model AUC: 0.629
| Factor | Value | Contribution | Direction |
|---|---|---|---|
| Occupancy Rate | 0.442 | +0.077 | ▲ risk |
| Medicare Day Pct | 0.713 | +0.066 | ▲ risk |
| Medicaid Day Pct | nan | +nan | ▼ risk |
| Revenue Per Bed | 244928.074 | +0.079 | ▲ risk |
| Net To Gross Ratio | 0.472 | +0.046 | ▲ risk |
| Beds | 27.000 | -0.016 | ▼ risk |
RCM Improvement Opportunity
Total (risk-adjusted): $8.4M
Current margin: 22.7%
Projected margin: 149.7%
Grade: A
Comps: 134
Gap analysis vs P75 peers with 60% closure assumption. Confidence-weighted by lever implementation difficulty.
| Lever | Current | Benchmark | Gap | Impact | Confidence | Timeline |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Payer Mix Optimization | 0.287 | 0.734 | 44.7% | $6.7M | 50% | 24mo |
| Occupancy Improvement | 0.442 | 0.685 | 24.3% | $1.6M | 55% | 24mo |
| Net-to-Gross Ratio Improvement | 0.472 | 0.582 | 11.0% | $85K | 65% | 18mo |
Predicted RCM Performance (Public Data Only)
B
RCM Grade
Average RCM profile — some improvement opportunities. Standard diligence scope recommended.
| Metric | Predicted | 90% CI | Percentile | Assessment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Denial Rate | 25.0% | [2.0%, 25.0%] | P83 | Below average — denial rate suggests RCM improvement opportu |
| Days in AR | 75.0 | [25.0, 75.0] | P83 | Below average — days in ar suggests RCM improvement opportun |
| Clean Claim Rate | 98.0% | [80.0%, 98.0%] | P0 | Strong — predicted clean claim rate is in the top third. |
| Net Collection Rate | 99.5% | [90.0%, 99.5%] | P8 | Strong — predicted net collection rate is in the top third. |