Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — SAGE SPECIALTY & REHAB OF LAFAYETTE 2026-04-26 06:36 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — SAGE SPECIALTY & REHAB OF LAFAYETTE
CCN 192057 | LA | 31 beds | Current EBITDA $177K → Pro Forma $309K (+$132K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$2.2M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$177K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$132K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$309K
Pro Forma EBITDA
+595bps
Margin Improvement
$85K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

61%
Realization (C)
$132K
Modeled Uplift
$80K
Risk-Adjusted
-$52K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 61% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Commercial Payer %, Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.1M (vs $0.1M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$51K
+230bp
Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$44K
+200bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$27K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+43bp
Total EBITDA Impact$132K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$43K$8K$51K$012mo
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$44K$44K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$7K$20K$27K$85K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT56.2% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Denial Rate Reduction$0$13K$25K$38K$51K$51K$51K$51K
Cost to Collect$0$11K$22K$33K$44K$44K$44K$44K
A/R Days Reduction$0$9K$18K$27K$27K$27K$27K$27K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$38K$75K$108K$132K$132K$132K$132K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $132K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x61% / 10.7x65% / 12.2x69% / 13.8x71% / 14.5x73% / 15.3x
9.0x56% / 9.1x60% / 10.5x64% / 11.9x66% / 12.6x68% / 13.2x
10.0x51% / 7.9x56% / 9.1x60% / 10.4x61% / 11.0x63% / 11.6x
11.0x47% / 6.9x52% / 8.0x56% / 9.1x57% / 9.7x59% / 10.2x
12.0x43% / 6.0x48% / 7.1x52% / 8.1x54% / 8.6x56% / 9.1x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
4.9x
Pro Forma Leverage
1.6x
Headroom (turns)
25%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 25% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 4.9x, adding 3.6 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$177K$177K8.0%
Year 1$182K+$88K$270K12.2%
Year 2$188K+$132K$319K14.4%
Year 3$193K+$132K$325K14.7%
Year 4$199K+$132K$331K15.0%
Year 5$205K+$132K$337K15.2%
$1.8M
Entry EV (10x)
$3.7M
Exit EV (11x)
$1.9M
Value Created
$337K
Exit EBITDA
$282K
Organic Growth
$1.3M
RCM Value Creation
$337K
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Denial Rate Reductio$25K$38K$51K$61K
Cost to Collect$22K$33K$44K$53K
A/R Days Reduction$13K$20K$27K$32K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$66K$99K$132K$158K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 133 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-50.0%-19.2%-3.1%5.2%
P0
Net-to-Gross58.3%31.7%43.3%56.2%
P77
Occupancy21.3%21.3%48.6%69.8%
P25
Rev/Bed$71K$281K$459K$798K
P2
Exp/Bed$149K$270K$442K$962K
P5

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML