Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — RIVERSIDE HOSPITAL OF LOUISIANA 2026-04-26 07:59 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — RIVERSIDE HOSPITAL OF LOUISIANA
CCN 192043 | LA | 14 beds | Current EBITDA $364K → Pro Forma $1.1M (+$725K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$13.7M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$364K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$725K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$1.1M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+527bps
Margin Improvement
$527K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

79%
Realization (B)
$725K
Modeled Uplift
$575K
Risk-Adjusted
-$150K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 79% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Commercial Payer %. Risks: Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.6M (vs $0.7M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$275K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$273K
+199bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$167K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+7bp
Total EBITDA Impact$725K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$275K$275K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$265K$8K$273K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$42K$125K$167K$527K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT62.6% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$69K$137K$206K$275K$275K$275K$275K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$68K$136K$205K$273K$273K$273K$273K
A/R Days Reduction$0$56K$112K$167K$167K$167K$167K$167K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$197K$395K$588K$725K$725K$725K$725K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $725K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x82% / 19.8x86% / 22.3x90% / 24.9x92% / 26.2x94% / 27.4x
9.0x77% / 17.2x81% / 19.5x85% / 21.8x87% / 22.9x89% / 24.0x
10.0x72% / 15.2x77% / 17.2x81% / 19.3x83% / 20.3x84% / 21.3x
11.0x68% / 13.5x73% / 15.3x77% / 17.2x79% / 18.1x80% / 19.1x
12.0x65% / 12.1x69% / 13.8x73% / 15.5x75% / 16.4x77% / 17.2x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
2.8x
Pro Forma Leverage
3.7x
Headroom (turns)
56%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 56% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 2.8x, adding 5.6 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$364K$364K2.7%
Year 1$375K+$483K$858K6.2%
Year 2$387K+$725K$1.1M8.1%
Year 3$398K+$725K$1.1M8.2%
Year 4$410K+$725K$1.1M8.3%
Year 5$423K+$725K$1.1M8.3%
$3.6M
Entry EV (10x)
$12.6M
Exit EV (11x)
$9.0M
Value Created
$1.1M
Exit EBITDA
$581K
Organic Growth
$7.2M
RCM Value Creation
$1.1M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$137K$206K$275K$330K
Denial Rate Reductio$136K$205K$273K$327K
A/R Days Reduction$84K$125K$167K$201K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$362K$543K$725K$870K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 82 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin2.7%-12.2%-1.1%11.8%
P57
Net-to-Gross57.6%35.2%49.6%62.6%
P66
Occupancy110.0%20.5%44.2%64.3%
P99
Rev/Bed$982K$317K$662K$1.1M
P68
Exp/Bed$956K$290K$597K$1.2M
P63

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML