Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — HOUMA - AMG SPECIALTY HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 12:27 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — HOUMA - AMG SPECIALTY HOSPITAL
CCN 192037 | LA | 40 beds | Current EBITDA $1.4M → Pro Forma $2.0M (+$637K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$12.0M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$1.4M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$637K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$2.0M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+529bps
Margin Improvement
$462K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

66%
Realization (C)
$637K
Modeled Uplift
$420K
Risk-Adjusted
-$218K
Execution Discount
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 66% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count, Commercial Payer %. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.4M (vs $0.6M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$241K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$240K
+199bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$147K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+8bp
Total EBITDA Impact$637K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$241K$241K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$232K$8K$240K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$37K$110K$147K$462K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT56.1% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$60K$120K$181K$241K$241K$241K$241K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$60K$120K$180K$240K$240K$240K$240K
A/R Days Reduction$0$49K$98K$147K$147K$147K$147K$147K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$174K$348K$517K$637K$637K$637K$637K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $637K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x54% / 8.7x58% / 10.0x62% / 11.3x64% / 12.0x66% / 12.6x
9.0x49% / 7.3x53% / 8.5x58% / 9.7x59% / 10.3x61% / 10.9x
10.0x44% / 6.3x49% / 7.3x53% / 8.4x55% / 8.9x57% / 9.5x
11.0x40% / 5.4x45% / 6.4x49% / 7.3x51% / 7.8x53% / 8.3x
12.0x36% / 4.7x41% / 5.6x45% / 6.5x47% / 6.9x49% / 7.3x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.8x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.7x
Headroom (turns)
11%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 11% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.8x, adding 2.7 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$1.4M$1.4M11.3%
Year 1$1.4M+$425K$1.8M15.1%
Year 2$1.4M+$637K$2.1M17.2%
Year 3$1.5M+$637K$2.1M17.6%
Year 4$1.5M+$637K$2.2M18.0%
Year 5$1.6M+$637K$2.2M18.3%
$13.6M
Entry EV (10x)
$24.3M
Exit EV (11x)
$10.7M
Value Created
$2.2M
Exit EBITDA
$2.2M
Organic Growth
$6.4M
RCM Value Creation
$2.2M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$120K$181K$241K$289K
Denial Rate Reductio$120K$180K$240K$288K
A/R Days Reduction$73K$110K$147K$176K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$319K$478K$637K$765K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 126 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin11.3%-21.2%-3.8%4.9%
P87
Net-to-Gross42.3%31.5%42.0%56.1%
P50
Occupancy45.7%21.3%46.5%65.1%
P47
Rev/Bed$301K$273K$435K$868K
P33
Exp/Bed$267K$261K$442K$965K
P25

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML