ML Analysis — HOUMA - AMG SPECIALTY HOSPITAL
CCN 192037 | Clustering + Distress + RCM Opportunity
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
Investability Score
Speculative — only pursue if turnaround thesis is strong and entry multiple reflects risk.
43
/ 100 (D)
Financial Health15/25
RCM Upside7/25
Market Position8/20
Demand Defensibility4/15
Operational Efficiency9/15
Entry Multiple: 8.0x – 10.0x
Est. MOIC: 1.9x
Risk Factors:
- Heavy Medicare dependence (>55%)
- Small facility (<50 beds) — limited scale
Catalysts:
- Limited competition supports pricing power
Margin Prediction (Trained Ridge Model)
-6.7%
R²=0.34 | n=4,907 | Grade B | Actual: 11.3%
Ridge regression trained on 4,907 HCRIS hospitals. 90% CI: [-34.9%, 21.6%]. P45 nationally.
| Driver | Value | Effect | Explanation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue/Bed | 301178.375 | -0.1784 | Lower Revenue/Bed decreases predicted margin | |
| Expense/Bed | 267265.625 | +0.1712 | Higher Expense/Bed increases predicted margin | |
| Bed Utilization Value | 137572.506 | -0.0244 | Lower Bed Utilization Value decreases predicted ma | |
| Bed Count | 40.000 | +0.0170 | Higher Bed Count increases predicted margin | |
| Log(Beds) | 3.689 | -0.0159 | Lower Log(Beds) decreases predicted margin |
nan%
Distress Risk
$6.8M
RCM Opportunity
A
Opportunity Grade
67.8%
Projected Margin
Distress Analysis
Risk: Unknown
National distress rate: 49.3%
LA distress rate: 46.3%
Model AUC: 0.629
| Factor | Value | Contribution | Direction |
|---|---|---|---|
| Occupancy Rate | 0.457 | +0.063 | ▲ risk |
| Medicare Day Pct | 0.602 | +0.047 | ▲ risk |
| Medicaid Day Pct | nan | +nan | ▼ risk |
| Revenue Per Bed | 301178.375 | +0.075 | ▲ risk |
| Net To Gross Ratio | 0.423 | +0.024 | ▲ risk |
| Beds | 40.000 | -0.015 | ▼ risk |
RCM Improvement Opportunity
Total (risk-adjusted): $6.8M
Current margin: 11.3%
Projected margin: 67.8%
Grade: A
Comps: 125
Gap analysis vs P75 peers with 60% closure assumption. Confidence-weighted by lever implementation difficulty.
| Lever | Current | Benchmark | Gap | Impact | Confidence | Timeline |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Payer Mix Optimization | 0.398 | 0.751 | 35.3% | $5.3M | 50% | 24mo |
| Occupancy Improvement | 0.457 | 0.657 | 20.1% | $1.3M | 55% | 24mo |
| Net-to-Gross Ratio Improvement | 0.423 | 0.562 | 13.9% | $196K | 65% | 18mo |
Predicted RCM Performance (Public Data Only)
B
RCM Grade
Average RCM profile — some improvement opportunities. Standard diligence scope recommended.
| Metric | Predicted | 90% CI | Percentile | Assessment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Denial Rate | 25.0% | [2.0%, 25.0%] | P83 | Below average — denial rate suggests RCM improvement opportu |
| Days in AR | 75.0 | [25.0, 75.0] | P83 | Below average — days in ar suggests RCM improvement opportun |
| Clean Claim Rate | 98.0% | [80.0%, 98.0%] | P0 | Strong — predicted clean claim rate is in the top third. |
| Net Collection Rate | 99.5% | [90.0%, 99.5%] | P8 | Strong — predicted net collection rate is in the top third. |