Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — BLIANT SPRCIALTY HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 06:36 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — BLIANT SPRCIALTY HOSPITAL
CCN 192030 | LA | 21 beds | Current EBITDA $70K → Pro Forma $224K (+$153K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$2.6M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$70K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$153K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$224K
Pro Forma EBITDA
+582bps
Margin Improvement
$101K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

63%
Realization (C)
$153K
Modeled Uplift
$97K
Risk-Adjusted
-$56K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli

Expected realization: 63% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Commercial Payer %, Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.1M (vs $0.2M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$59K
+224bp
Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$53K
+200bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$32K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+36bp
Total EBITDA Impact$153K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$51K$8K$59K$012mo
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$53K$53K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$8K$24K$32K$101K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT60.5% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Denial Rate Reduction$0$15K$30K$44K$59K$59K$59K$59K
Cost to Collect$0$13K$26K$40K$53K$53K$53K$53K
A/R Days Reduction$0$11K$21K$32K$32K$32K$32K$32K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$43K$87K$126K$153K$153K$153K$153K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $153K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x84% / 21.2x89% / 23.9x93% / 26.6x95% / 27.9x96% / 29.3x
9.0x79% / 18.4x84% / 20.9x88% / 23.3x90% / 24.5x91% / 25.7x
10.0x75% / 16.3x79% / 18.4x83% / 20.6x85% / 21.7x87% / 22.8x
11.0x71% / 14.5x75% / 16.5x79% / 18.4x81% / 19.4x83% / 20.4x
12.0x67% / 13.0x71% / 14.8x75% / 16.6x77% / 17.6x79% / 18.4x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
2.7x
Pro Forma Leverage
3.8x
Headroom (turns)
59%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 59% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 2.7x, adding 5.8 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$70K$70K2.7%
Year 1$73K+$102K$175K6.6%
Year 2$75K+$153K$228K8.7%
Year 3$77K+$153K$230K8.7%
Year 4$79K+$153K$233K8.8%
Year 5$82K+$153K$235K8.9%
$704K
Entry EV (10x)
$2.6M
Exit EV (11x)
$1.9M
Value Created
$235K
Exit EBITDA
$112K
Organic Growth
$1.5M
RCM Value Creation
$235K
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Denial Rate Reductio$30K$44K$59K$71K
Cost to Collect$26K$40K$53K$63K
A/R Days Reduction$16K$24K$32K$39K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$77K$115K$153K$184K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 122 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin2.7%-14.8%-2.1%6.6%
P65
Net-to-Gross60.2%33.7%46.2%60.5%
P74
Occupancy28.5%21.1%46.4%69.9%
P36
Rev/Bed$126K$288K$466K$885K
P2
Exp/Bed$122K$272K$468K$963K
P2

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML