Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ACADIA-ST. LANDRY HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 17:33 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ACADIA-ST. LANDRY HOSPITAL
CCN 191319 | LA | 15 beds | Current EBITDA $-979K → Pro Forma $-161K (+$818K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$15.5M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-979K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$818K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-161K
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$596K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

66%
Realization (C)
$818K
Modeled Uplift
$540K
Risk-Adjusted
-$278K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 66% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Commercial Payer %, Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.5M (vs $0.8M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$311K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$308K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$189K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$818K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$311K$311K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$299K$9K$308K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$48K$141K$189K$596K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT61.4% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$78K$155K$233K$311K$311K$311K$311K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$77K$154K$231K$308K$308K$308K$308K
A/R Days Reduction$0$63K$126K$189K$189K$189K$189K$189K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$223K$445K$663K$818K$818K$818K$818K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $818K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-979K$-979K-6.3%
Year 1$-1.0M+$545K$-463K-3.0%
Year 2$-1.0M+$818K$-221K-1.4%
Year 3$-1.1M+$818K$-252K-1.6%
Year 4$-1.1M+$818K$-284K-1.8%
Year 5$-1.1M+$818K$-317K-2.0%
$-9.8M
Entry EV (10x)
$-3.5M
Exit EV (11x)
$6.3M
Value Created
$-317K
Exit EBITDA
$-1.6M
Organic Growth
$8.2M
RCM Value Creation
$-317K
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$155K$233K$311K$373K
Denial Rate Reductio$154K$231K$308K$369K
A/R Days Reduction$95K$142K$189K$227K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$409K$613K$818K$981K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 89 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-6.3%-13.9%-1.7%8.4%
P37
Net-to-Gross100.0%34.2%48.6%61.4%
P95
Occupancy42.4%20.5%45.1%65.4%
P47
Rev/Bed$1.0M$335K$658K$1.1M
P72
Exp/Bed$1.1M$295K$602K$1.2M
P72

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML